Use of ChatGPT to Generate Informed Consent for Surgery in Urogynecology

泌尿妇科 知情同意 医学 医学物理学 普通外科 外科 替代医学 病理 尿失禁
作者
Emily S. Johnson,Eva K. Welch,Jacqueline Y. Kikuchi,H Barbier,Christine M. Vaccaro,Felicia L. Balzano,Katherine L. Dengler
标识
DOI:10.1097/spv.0000000000001638
摘要

Use of the publicly available Large Language Model, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT 3.5; OpenAI, 2022), is growing in health care despite varying accuracies. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT's responses to questions encompassing surgical informed consent in urogynecology. Five fellowship-trained urogynecology attending physicians and 1 reconstructive female urologist evaluated ChatGPT's responses to questions about 4 surgical procedures: (1) retropubic midurethral sling, (2) total vaginal hysterectomy, (3) uterosacral ligament suspension, and (4) sacrocolpopexy. Questions involved procedure descriptions, risks/benefits/alternatives, and additional resources. Responses were rated using the DISCERN tool, a 4-point accuracy scale, and the Flesch-Kinkaid Grade Level score. The median DISCERN tool overall rating was 3 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-4), indicating a moderate rating ("potentially important but not serious shortcomings"). Retropubic midurethral sling received the highest overall score (median, 4; IQR, 3-4), and uterosacral ligament suspension received the lowest (median, 3; IQR, 3-3). Using the 4-point accuracy scale, 44.0% of responses received a score of 4 ("correct and adequate"), 22.6% received a score of 3 ("correct but insufficient"), 29.8% received a score of 2 ("accurate and misleading information together"), and 3.6% received a score of 1 ("wrong or irrelevant answer"). ChatGPT performance was poor for discussion of benefits and alternatives for all surgical procedures, with some responses being inaccurate. The mean Flesch-Kinkaid Grade Level score for all responses was 17.5 (SD, 2.1), corresponding to a postgraduate reading level. Overall, ChatGPT generated accurate responses to questions about surgical informed consent. However, it produced clearly false portions of responses, highlighting the need for a careful review of responses by qualified health care professionals.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lucas应助学术答辩采纳,获得10
刚刚
2秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
碧蓝帅哥发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
怕黑的擎发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Gheros发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
zho发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
学术废物完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
串串发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
劲秉应助研友_Z3vemn采纳,获得30
9秒前
amanda发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
Yippee完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
学术答辩发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Clover完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
luka完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
慎独而已应助此话当真采纳,获得20
17秒前
17秒前
Blummer完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
学术答辩完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
LXC完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
jn发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
唠叨的天亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
精明平露发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
mm完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
饿哭了塞完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
32秒前
dada发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
李漂亮完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
xixixixix发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
如意2023发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
马家辉完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
单薄凝荷完成签到,获得积分20
36秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 2000
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
Crystal structures of UP2, UAs2, UAsS, and UAsSe in the pressure range up to 60 GPa 570
Mantodea of the World: Species Catalog Andrew M 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3465478
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3058648
关于积分的说明 9062429
捐赠科研通 2748998
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1508231
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 696880
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 696535