医学
急性冠脉综合征
心肌梗塞
辛伐他汀
不稳定型心绞痛
临床终点
冲程(发动机)
内科学
血运重建
结果(博弈论)
随机化
临床试验
安慰剂
心血管事件
随机对照试验
心脏病学
替代医学
机械工程
数学
数理经济学
病理
工程类
作者
Rachel Marceau West,Gregory T. Golm,Devan V. Mehrotra
标识
DOI:10.1177/17407745241267999
摘要
Composite time-to-event endpoints are commonly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. For example, the IMPROVE-IT trial comparing ezetimibe+simvastatin to placebo+simvastatin in 18,144 patients with acute coronary syndrome used a primary composite endpoint with five component outcomes: (1) cardiovascular death, (2) non-fatal stroke, (3) non-fatal myocardial infarction, (4) coronary revascularization ≥30 days after randomization, and (5) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. In such settings, the traditional analysis compares treatments using the observed time to the occurrence of the first (i.e. earliest) component outcome for each patient. This approach ignores information for subsequent outcome(s), possibly leading to reduced power to demonstrate the benefit of the test versus the control treatment. We use real data examples and simulations to contrast the traditional approach with several alternative approaches that use data for all the intra-patient component outcomes, not just the first.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI