The effect of Inc parameter on VMAT radiotherapy plans quality for rectal cancer using Monaco TPS

Abstract Background To investigate the effect of the Increment of gantry angle (Inc) parameter setting of the Monaco Treatment planning system (Monaco TPS) on the dosimetry and quality parameters of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) program for rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 patients with rectal cancer who underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy using the Monaco TPS system from 2020 to 2021. Under the same optimization function configuration and other parameter settings, the Inc parameters in the VMAT radiotherapy plan were set to 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°. The dose‐volume histogram (DVH) was used to evaluate the dose distribution of the target area and the radiation dose of the organs at risk (OAR). The differences in the dosimetry of the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR, as well as the gamma pass rate (GPR) were compared. Results In terms of target dose, D98, D min , HI, and conformity index (CI) of Inc10 group was significantly lower than those of Inc20, 30, and 40 groups ( P < 0.05), and D2 of Inc10 group was significantly higher than that of Inc20 group ( P = 0.009). We also found CI of Inc20 and 30 were significantly better than that of Inc40 (both P < 0.05). In terms of OAR dose, the study found that the D mean , D min , V 50% , V 45% , and V 40% for the bladder of the Inc10 group were lower than those of the other groups (all P < 0.05), the D mean for femoral head of the Inc20 group was lower than that of the Inc30 group ( P < 0.05), and Inc20 showed a better protective effect on the femoral head. The MUs tend to decrease as the Inc parameter setting is increased. The monitor unit (MU) in Inc10 group were significantly higher than those in Inc20, Inc30, and Inc40 groups, and the MU of Inc20 group was significantly higher than that of Inc40 group (both P < 0.05). We found that for the 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm standards, the GPRs of each plan were > 90%, which met clinical requirements. Conclusions Different settings of Inc parameters have varying degrees of impact on target dose, OAR dose, and machine MU. It is important for doctors to choose different Inc parameters according to different clinical needs.