医学
回廊的
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术
倾向得分匹配
急诊医学
回顾性队列研究
外科
颈椎
作者
Steve H. Monk,Ummey Hani,Deborah Pfortmiller,Mark D. Smith,Paul K. Kim,Michael A. Bohl,Domagoj Coric,Tim E. Adamson,Christopher M. Holland,Matthew J. McGirt
出处
期刊:Spine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2022-10-17
卷期号:48 (3): 155-163
被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000004500
摘要
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.Assess the cost-utility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus inpatient hospital setting for Medicare and privately insured patients at one-year follow-up.Outpatient ACDF has gained popularity due to improved safety and reduced costs. Formal cost-utility studies for ambulatory versus inpatient ACDF are lacking, precluding an accurate assessment of cost-effectiveness.A total of 6504 patients enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) undergoing one-level to two-level ACDF at a single ASC (520) or the inpatient hospital setting (5984) were compared. Propensity matching generated 748 patients for analysis (374 per cohort). Demographic data, resource utilization, patient-reported outcome measures, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed. Direct costs (1-year resource use×unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts) and indirect costs (missed workdays×average US daily wage) were recorded. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated.Complication rates and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures and QALYs were similar between groups. Ambulatory ACDF was associated with significantly lower total costs at 1 year for Medicare ($5879.46) and privately insured ($12,873.97) patients, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for inpatient ACDF was $3,674,662 and $8,046,231 for Medicare and privately insured patients, respectively, reflecting unacceptably poor cost-utility.Inpatient ACDF is associated with significant increases in total costs compared to the ASC setting without a safety, outcome, or QALY benefit. The ASC setting is a dominant option from a health economy perspective for first-time one-l to two-level ACDF in select patients compared to the inpatient hospital setting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI