清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality

语言学 凝聚力(化学) 判决 语法 质量(理念) 应用语言学 惊喜 语法 学术写作 计算机科学 转换语法 心理学 社会学 人工智能 认识论 哲学 社会心理学 化学 有机化学
作者
Stephen P. Witte,Lester Faigley
出处
期刊:College Composition and Communication [JSTOR]
卷期号:32 (2): 189-189 被引量:431
标识
DOI:10.2307/356693
摘要

A question of continuing interest to researchers in writing is what internal characteristics distinguish essays ranked high and low in overall quality. Empirical research at the college level has for the most part taken two approaches to this question, examining errors1 and syntactic features2 while generally ignoring the features of texts that extend across sentence boundaries.3 Neither the error approach nor the syntactic approach has been entirely satisfactory. For example, Elaine Maimon and Barbara Nodine's sentence-combining experiment suggests that, as is true when other skills and processes are learned, certain kinds of errors accompany certain stages in learning to write.4 Because the sources of error in written discourse are often complex and difficult to trace, researchers can conclude little more than what is obvious: low-rated papers usually contain far more errors than high-rated papers. With regard to syntax, Ann Gebhard found that with few exceptions the syntactic features of highand low-rated essays written by college students are not clearly differentiated. Indeed, research in writing quality based on conventions of written English and on theories of syntax, particularly transformational grammar, has not provided specific directions for the teaching of writing. Such results come as no surprise in light of much current research in written discourse. This research-published in such fields as linguistics, cybernetics, anthropology, psychology, and artificial intelligence-addresses questions, concerned with extended discourse rather than with individual sentences, questions about how humans produce and understand discourse units often referred to as texts.5 One such effort that has attracted the attention of researchers in writing is M. A. K. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan's Cohesion in English.6 Although Halliday and Hasan do not propose a theory of text structure or examine how humans produce texts, they do attempt to define the concept of text. To them a text is a semantic unit, the parts of
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
研友_Z7XY28完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
科研狗完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
19秒前
xiaosun发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
zulpiye完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
搬砖的化学男完成签到 ,获得积分0
33秒前
yuehan完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
共享精神应助zedmaster采纳,获得10
55秒前
sobergod完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
zzhui完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Lucas应助李家豪采纳,获得10
2分钟前
社恐Forza应助elisa828采纳,获得10
2分钟前
氕氘氚完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
WD完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
希望天下0贩的0应助崔哥采纳,获得30
3分钟前
lovexa完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
DrCuiTianjin完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
zyjsunye完成签到 ,获得积分0
4分钟前
李思晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
薏仁完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
俊逸的代曼完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
深情安青应助GAOGONGZI采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
5分钟前
蓝绝完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
崔哥发布了新的文献求助30
5分钟前
jerry完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
creep2020完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
elisa828完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
研友_892kOL完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
aiyawy完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
Ava应助丹布里采纳,获得10
7分钟前
充电宝应助GAOGONGZI采纳,获得10
7分钟前
zhangguo完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
丹布里完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
丹布里发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
高分求助中
Evolution 3rd edition 1500
Lire en communiste 1000
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 700
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 700
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline: an important aroma component of cooked rice 500
Ribozymes and aptamers in the RNA world, and in synthetic biology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3179999
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2830380
关于积分的说明 7976509
捐赠科研通 2491938
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1329096
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 635652
版权声明 602954