克朗巴赫阿尔法
临床心理学
心理学
柱头(植物学)
可靠性(半导体)
有效性
比例(比率)
内容有效性
结构效度
探索性因素分析
医学
精神科
心理测量学
量子力学
物理
功率(物理)
作者
Yufeng Li,Ma Hongwen,Ruonan Hou,Zhang Ya-jing,Chuyun Cui,Chang-De Jin
出处
期刊:The Journal of practical nursing
日期:2017-10-21
卷期号:33 (30): 2343-2347
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.30.006
摘要
Objective
To translate the English version of Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale(DSAS-2) into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DSAS-2.
Methods
The DSAS-2 was translated and adapted according to Chinese culture following the translation and back-retranslation procedure. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DSAS-2 was tested among 294 patients with type 2 diabetes.
Results
The Chinese version of DSAS-2 included three subscales: Treated Differently (6 items), Blame and Judgment (7 items), and Self-stigma (6 items) and contained a total of 19 items. The Cronbach α coefficient of the Chinese version of DSAS-2 was 0.879, the Cronbach α coefficient of three factors was 0.832, 0.815 and 0.844, respectively; the test-retest reliability was 0.835. The content validity index was 0.916. The scores of DSAS-2 correlated with the scores of Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 8-Item Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (r=-0.452, 0.443, 0.412, P<0.01). Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and could explain 55.75% of the total variance.
Conclusions
The Chinese version of DSAS-2 has acceptable reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate stigma among patients with type 2 diabetes in China.
Key words:
Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Stigma; Reliability; Validity
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI