Calcified In-Stent Restenosis

再狭窄 冠状动脉再狭窄 支架 医学 心脏病学 内科学 放射科
作者
Fernándo Alfonso,Jorge Sandoval,Christian H. Nolte
出处
期刊:Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:5 (1) 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.111.966606
摘要

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 5, No. 1Calcified In-Stent Restenosis Free AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBCalcified In-Stent RestenosisA Rare Cause of Dilation Failure Requiring Rotational Atherectomy Fernando Alfonso, MD, Jorge Sandoval, MD and Christian Nolte, MD Fernando AlfonsoFernando Alfonso From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. , Jorge SandovalJorge Sandoval From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. and Christian NolteChristian Nolte From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Originally published1 Feb 2012https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966606Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5:e1–e2IntroductionThe acute results of repeated interventions for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are largely satisfactory, although some patients may still have recurrences.1,2 In this anatomic scenario, lack of initial angiographic success is exceedingly rare.1,2 We report a patient with "undilatable" ISR that eventually required rotational atherectomy to achieve procedural success. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) unraveled the presence of severely calcified intrastent tissue, leading to "resistant" ISR.A 77-year-old man on hemodialysis was investigated for unstable angina. Coronary angiography revealed ISR of a bare metal stent that had been implanted in the right coronary artery 10 years before (Figure 1A). A saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery and a drug-eluting stent implanted at the left main toward the proximal circumflex coronary artery showed good results. Initial coronary intervention on the right coronary artery was unsuccessful because of resistant ISR. After failure of conventional balloons, 2 different noncompliant balloons eventually ruptured (20 bar) at the lesion site.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. A, Angiography (lateral projection) showing diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). B through D, Optical coherence tomography images revealing calcified intrastent tissue (plus sign) with variable morphology and degree of lumen obstruction (asterisk denotes wire artifact). E, Intravascular ultrasound imaging disclosing calcified ISR shadowing the underlying stent struts.At a repeated procedure performed 1 week later, OCT imaging revealed severe and diffuse calcification of the intrastent tissue (Figure 1B, 1C, and 1D) with a minimal lumen area of 1.5 mm2. Some neointimal ruptures were recognized (attributed to the previous treatment), but additional images of neoatherogenesis—as thin-cap fibroatheroma—were not present. IVUS (Figure 1E) also showed severe intrastent calcification with a "napkin-ring" image shadowing most of the stent struts. Rotational atherectomy (bur size diameter, 1.75 mm) followed by sequential repeated (the first balloon ruptured) high-pressure (up to 28 bar) noncompliant balloon inflation allowed successful lesion dilation. Subsequently, 2 overlapping everolimus-eluting stents were implanted with excellent angiographic results (Figure 2A). Optimal stent expansion was confirmed by OCT and IVUS (Figure 2B and 2C).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. Final procedural results with an optimal lumen and adequate stent expansion. A, Angiography; B, optical coherence tomography (plus sign indicates calcium within the "sandwich" stent; asterisk denotes wire artifact); and C, intravascular ultrasound.Procedural failure in patients with ISR is very rare. In some cases, however, balloon slippage phenomena may complicate these procedures.1 In other patients, severe underexpansion of the underlying stent may be very difficult to tackle, and residual underexpansion may trigger recurrent ISR.2 This problem usually results from suboptimal initial stent deployment on heavily calcified lesions.2 Finally, neoatherosclerosis—rather than classic neointimal hyperplasia—has been encountered in some patients with ISR, but the implications of this pathological finding remain unsettled.3 In this scenario, the terms "de novo " or "late atherosclerosis " might be preferred over late ISR. To the best of our knowledge, "resistant" ISR resulting from heavily calcified tissue within the stent has not been previously reported. This phenomenon was detected a decade after initial stent implantation in a patient with severe renal failure. Whether treatment of very "old" ISR should be different from that of ISR presenting within the typical time frame remains unknown. Although the implications of coronary calcification in patients on hemodialysis are well established, the presence and implications of calcified ISR in this population have not been studied.4 Rotational atherectomy was selected as the strategy of choice in our patients, although other techniques, such as cutting balloon angioplasty, may also be of value in heavily calcified lesions. The combined use of IVUS and OCT provided unique insights disclosing the underlying etiology accounting for dilation failure and proved to be instrumental to guide the repeated intervention.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Fernando Alfonso, MD, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain. E-mail [email protected]com.References1. Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Gómez-Recio M, Insa L, Calvo I, Hernández JM, Bullones JA, Hernández R, Escaned J, Macaya C, Gama-Ribeiro V, Leitao-Marques A; Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Implications of the "watermelon seeding" phenomenon during coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 66: 521– 527. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Alfonso F, García J, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernando L, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Bañuelos C, Macaya C. New stent implantation for recurrences after stenting for in-stent restenosis: implications of a third metal layer in human coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 1036– 1038. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 1314– 1322. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Shantouf RS, Budoff MJ, Ahmadi N, Ghaffari A, Flores F, Gopal A, Noori N, Jing J, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Total and individual coronary artery calcium scores as independent predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2010; 31: 419– 425. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Alfonso F, Rivero F and Cortese B (2022) Excimer laser prior to drug-coated balloon treatment of in-stent restenosis, International Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.082, 348, (47-49), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022. Nakama T, Saito A, Obunai K, Azumi Y and Watanabe H (2021) Calcified nodule progression-related stent thrombosis after polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent implantation for femoropopliteal artery, Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques, 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.09.016, 7:3, (510-511), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021. Neupane S, Basir M, Tan C, Sultan A, Tabaku M, Alqarqaz M, Khandelwal A, Gupta A, Don C and Alaswad K (2020) Feasibility and safety of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis secondary to stent under‐expansion, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.28675, 97:1, (2-7), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021. Yasumura K, Benhuri B, Vengrenyuk Y, Petrov A, Barman N, Sweeny J, Kapur V, Suleman J, Baber U, Mehran R, Stone G, Kini A and Sharma S (2020) Procedural and 1‐year clinical outcomes of orbital atherectomy for treatment of coronary in‐stent restenosis: A single‐center, retrospective study, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.28983, 97:3, Online publication date: 15-Feb-2021. Jeger R, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad W, Ge J, Poerner T, Shin E, Alfonso F, Latib A, Ong P, Rissanen T, Saucedo J, Scheller B and Kleber F (2020) Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043, 13:12, (1391-1402), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Kawai K, Akahori H, Imanaka T, Miki K, Yoshihara N, Yanaka K, Masuyama T and Ishihara M (2019) Coronary restenosis of in-stent protruding bump with rapid progression: Optical frequency domain imaging and angioscopic observation, Journal of Cardiology Cases, 10.1016/j.jccase.2018.08.010, 19:1, (12-14), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019. Alfonso F and Cuesta J (2018) The Therapeutic Dilemma of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11:8, Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Hachinohe D, Kashima Y, Hirata K, Kanno D, Kobayashi K, Kaneko U, Sugie T, Tadano Y, Watanabe T, Shitan H, Haraguchi T, Enomoto M, Sato K and Fujita T (2018) Treatment for in-stent restenosis requiring rotational atherectomy, Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 10.1111/joic.12558, 31:6, (747-754), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Kini A, Narula J, Vengrenyuk Y and Sharma S (2018) Post-Stent Evaluation, Stent Thrombosis, and In-Stent Restenosis Atlas of Coronary Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography, 10.1007/978-3-319-62666-6_4, (61-86), . Shlofmitz E, Shlofmitz R, Galougahi K, Rahim H, Virmani R, Hill J, Matsumura M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Landmesser U, Stone G and Ali Z (2018) Algorithmic Approach for Optical Coherence Tomography–Guided Stent Implantation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Interventional Cardiology Clinics, 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.001, 7:3, (329-344), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Kashiwagi M, Tanimoto T and Kitabata H (2018) Severely Circumferentially Calcified Neointima as a New Cause of Undilatable In-Stent Restenosis, Case Reports in Cardiology, 10.1155/2018/5764897, 2018, (1-3), Online publication date: 29-May-2018. Murata N, Takayama T, Hiro T and Hirayama A (2017) Balloon pin-hole rupture during percutaneous coronary intervention for recurrent, calcified in-stent restenosis: A case report, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.27405, 91:7, (1287-1290), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018. Jinnouchi H, Inoue K, Soga Y, Tomoi Y, Kobayashi Y, Hiramori S, Shirai S and Ando K (2017) Pathology of Neointimal Calcification in Very Late Restenosis After Bare Metal Stent Implantation for Superficial Femoral Artery, International Heart Journal, 10.1536/ihj.16-379, 58:4, (641-644), . Tanaka A, Latib A, Jabbour R, Kawamoto H, Giannini F, Ancona M, Regazzoli D, Mangieri A, Mattioli R, Chieffo A, Carlino M, Montorfano M and Colombo A (2016) Impact of Angiographic Result After Predilatation on Outcome After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of In-Stent Coronary Restenosis, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.006, 118:10, (1460-1465), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016. Alfonso F, Cuesta J, Bastante T, Aguilera M, Benedicto A and Rivero F (2016) In-Stent Restenosis Caused by a Calcified Nodule: A Novel Pattern of Neoatherosclerosis, Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.08.014, 32:6, (830.e1-830.e3), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Looser P, Kim L and Feldman D (2016) In-Stent Restenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1007/s11936-015-0433-7, 18:2, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Bastante T, Rivero F, Cuesta J and Alfonso F (2015) Calcified Neoatherosclerosis Causing "Undilatable" In-Stent Restenosis, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.024, 8:15, (2039-2040), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Alfonso F, Byrne R, Rivero F and Kastrati A (2014) Current Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.545, 63:24, (2659-2673), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014. Vergallo R, Yonetsu T, Uemura S, Park S, Lee S, Kato K, Jia H, Abtahian F, Tian J, Hu S, Lee H, McNulty I, Prasad A, Yu B, Zhang S, Porto I, Biasucci L, Crea F and Jang I (2013) Correlation Between Degree of Neointimal Hyperplasia and Incidence and Characteristics of Neoatherosclerosis as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.076, 112:9, (1315-1321), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013. Yonetsu T, Kato K, Kim S, Xing L, Jia H, McNulty I, Lee H, Zhang S, Uemura S, Jang Y, Kang S, Park S, Lee S, Yu B, Kakuta T and Jang I (2012) Predictors for Neoatherosclerosis, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 5:5, (660-666), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Yoshida K and Sadamatsu K (2012) A severely calcified neointima 9 years after bare metal stent implantation, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.002, 13:6, (350-352), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012. de la Torre Hernandez J, Rumoroso J, Subinas A, Gonzalo N, Ojeda S, Pan M, Martín Yuste V, Suárez A, Hernández F, Teruel L, Moreu J, Cubero J, Cascón J, Vinhas H, Lozano Í, Martin Moreiras J, Pérez de Prado A, Goicolea J and Escaned J (2017) Percutaneous intervention in chronic total coronary occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: procedural results and long-term clinical outcomes in the TORO (Spanish registry of chronic TOtal occlusion secondary to an occlusive in-stent RestenOsis) multicentre registry, EuroIntervention, 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00764, 13:2, (e219-e226) Her A and Shin E (2018) Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis, Korean Circulation Journal, 10.4070/kcj.2018.0103, 48:5, (337) February 2012Vol 5, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966606PMID: 22338004 Manuscript receivedOctober 23, 2011Manuscript acceptedJanuary 6, 2012Originally publishedFebruary 1, 2012 Keywordsrestenosisrotational atherectomycoronary imagingPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCatheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
sh131完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刘十三完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
银包铜关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
花生四烯酸完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
归海听云发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
丰富的野狼完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
粉面菜蛋完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
不吃橘子完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
KJ完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
suhang2024发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
自觉画笔完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
友好凌柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Leo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
vera完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
火星上的糖豆完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Aprial完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
阿巴阿巴完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小事完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
南城雨落完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
多吃青菜完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
端庄幻桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
情怀应助缪格采纳,获得10
11秒前
乐情完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
星川完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
lhnee发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
冷傲奇迹完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
天天快乐应助成就的寒天采纳,获得10
13秒前
屠夫9441完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
KJ发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 500
Coking simulation aids on-stream time 450
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4015939
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3555887
关于积分的说明 11319237
捐赠科研通 3288997
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1812357
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 887882
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 812044