亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Calcified In-Stent Restenosis

再狭窄 冠状动脉再狭窄 支架 医学 心脏病学 内科学 放射科
作者
Fernándo Alfonso,Jorge Sandoval,Christian H. Nolte
出处
期刊:Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:5 (1) 被引量:36
标识
DOI:10.1161/circinterventions.111.966606
摘要

HomeCirculation: Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 5, No. 1Calcified In-Stent Restenosis Free AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBCalcified In-Stent RestenosisA Rare Cause of Dilation Failure Requiring Rotational Atherectomy Fernando Alfonso, MD, Jorge Sandoval, MD and Christian Nolte, MD Fernando AlfonsoFernando Alfonso From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. , Jorge SandovalJorge Sandoval From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. and Christian NolteChristian Nolte From Interventional Cardiology, the Cardiovascular Institute, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Originally published1 Feb 2012https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966606Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5:e1–e2IntroductionThe acute results of repeated interventions for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are largely satisfactory, although some patients may still have recurrences.1,2 In this anatomic scenario, lack of initial angiographic success is exceedingly rare.1,2 We report a patient with "undilatable" ISR that eventually required rotational atherectomy to achieve procedural success. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) unraveled the presence of severely calcified intrastent tissue, leading to "resistant" ISR.A 77-year-old man on hemodialysis was investigated for unstable angina. Coronary angiography revealed ISR of a bare metal stent that had been implanted in the right coronary artery 10 years before (Figure 1A). A saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery and a drug-eluting stent implanted at the left main toward the proximal circumflex coronary artery showed good results. Initial coronary intervention on the right coronary artery was unsuccessful because of resistant ISR. After failure of conventional balloons, 2 different noncompliant balloons eventually ruptured (20 bar) at the lesion site.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. A, Angiography (lateral projection) showing diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). B through D, Optical coherence tomography images revealing calcified intrastent tissue (plus sign) with variable morphology and degree of lumen obstruction (asterisk denotes wire artifact). E, Intravascular ultrasound imaging disclosing calcified ISR shadowing the underlying stent struts.At a repeated procedure performed 1 week later, OCT imaging revealed severe and diffuse calcification of the intrastent tissue (Figure 1B, 1C, and 1D) with a minimal lumen area of 1.5 mm2. Some neointimal ruptures were recognized (attributed to the previous treatment), but additional images of neoatherogenesis—as thin-cap fibroatheroma—were not present. IVUS (Figure 1E) also showed severe intrastent calcification with a "napkin-ring" image shadowing most of the stent struts. Rotational atherectomy (bur size diameter, 1.75 mm) followed by sequential repeated (the first balloon ruptured) high-pressure (up to 28 bar) noncompliant balloon inflation allowed successful lesion dilation. Subsequently, 2 overlapping everolimus-eluting stents were implanted with excellent angiographic results (Figure 2A). Optimal stent expansion was confirmed by OCT and IVUS (Figure 2B and 2C).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. Final procedural results with an optimal lumen and adequate stent expansion. A, Angiography; B, optical coherence tomography (plus sign indicates calcium within the "sandwich" stent; asterisk denotes wire artifact); and C, intravascular ultrasound.Procedural failure in patients with ISR is very rare. In some cases, however, balloon slippage phenomena may complicate these procedures.1 In other patients, severe underexpansion of the underlying stent may be very difficult to tackle, and residual underexpansion may trigger recurrent ISR.2 This problem usually results from suboptimal initial stent deployment on heavily calcified lesions.2 Finally, neoatherosclerosis—rather than classic neointimal hyperplasia—has been encountered in some patients with ISR, but the implications of this pathological finding remain unsettled.3 In this scenario, the terms "de novo " or "late atherosclerosis " might be preferred over late ISR. To the best of our knowledge, "resistant" ISR resulting from heavily calcified tissue within the stent has not been previously reported. This phenomenon was detected a decade after initial stent implantation in a patient with severe renal failure. Whether treatment of very "old" ISR should be different from that of ISR presenting within the typical time frame remains unknown. Although the implications of coronary calcification in patients on hemodialysis are well established, the presence and implications of calcified ISR in this population have not been studied.4 Rotational atherectomy was selected as the strategy of choice in our patients, although other techniques, such as cutting balloon angioplasty, may also be of value in heavily calcified lesions. The combined use of IVUS and OCT provided unique insights disclosing the underlying etiology accounting for dilation failure and proved to be instrumental to guide the repeated intervention.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Fernando Alfonso, MD, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain. E-mail [email protected]com.References1. Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Gómez-Recio M, Insa L, Calvo I, Hernández JM, Bullones JA, Hernández R, Escaned J, Macaya C, Gama-Ribeiro V, Leitao-Marques A; Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Stenting (RIBS) Investigators. Implications of the "watermelon seeding" phenomenon during coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 66: 521– 527. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Alfonso F, García J, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernando L, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Bañuelos C, Macaya C. New stent implantation for recurrences after stenting for in-stent restenosis: implications of a third metal layer in human coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54: 1036– 1038. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 1314– 1322. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Shantouf RS, Budoff MJ, Ahmadi N, Ghaffari A, Flores F, Gopal A, Noori N, Jing J, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Total and individual coronary artery calcium scores as independent predictors of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2010; 31: 419– 425. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Alfonso F, Rivero F and Cortese B (2022) Excimer laser prior to drug-coated balloon treatment of in-stent restenosis, International Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.082, 348, (47-49), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022. Nakama T, Saito A, Obunai K, Azumi Y and Watanabe H (2021) Calcified nodule progression-related stent thrombosis after polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent implantation for femoropopliteal artery, Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques, 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.09.016, 7:3, (510-511), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021. Neupane S, Basir M, Tan C, Sultan A, Tabaku M, Alqarqaz M, Khandelwal A, Gupta A, Don C and Alaswad K (2020) Feasibility and safety of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of in‐stent restenosis secondary to stent under‐expansion, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.28675, 97:1, (2-7), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021. Yasumura K, Benhuri B, Vengrenyuk Y, Petrov A, Barman N, Sweeny J, Kapur V, Suleman J, Baber U, Mehran R, Stone G, Kini A and Sharma S (2020) Procedural and 1‐year clinical outcomes of orbital atherectomy for treatment of coronary in‐stent restenosis: A single‐center, retrospective study, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.28983, 97:3, Online publication date: 15-Feb-2021. Jeger R, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad W, Ge J, Poerner T, Shin E, Alfonso F, Latib A, Ong P, Rissanen T, Saucedo J, Scheller B and Kleber F (2020) Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043, 13:12, (1391-1402), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Kawai K, Akahori H, Imanaka T, Miki K, Yoshihara N, Yanaka K, Masuyama T and Ishihara M (2019) Coronary restenosis of in-stent protruding bump with rapid progression: Optical frequency domain imaging and angioscopic observation, Journal of Cardiology Cases, 10.1016/j.jccase.2018.08.010, 19:1, (12-14), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019. Alfonso F and Cuesta J (2018) The Therapeutic Dilemma of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11:8, Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018. Hachinohe D, Kashima Y, Hirata K, Kanno D, Kobayashi K, Kaneko U, Sugie T, Tadano Y, Watanabe T, Shitan H, Haraguchi T, Enomoto M, Sato K and Fujita T (2018) Treatment for in-stent restenosis requiring rotational atherectomy, Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 10.1111/joic.12558, 31:6, (747-754), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Kini A, Narula J, Vengrenyuk Y and Sharma S (2018) Post-Stent Evaluation, Stent Thrombosis, and In-Stent Restenosis Atlas of Coronary Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography, 10.1007/978-3-319-62666-6_4, (61-86), . Shlofmitz E, Shlofmitz R, Galougahi K, Rahim H, Virmani R, Hill J, Matsumura M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Landmesser U, Stone G and Ali Z (2018) Algorithmic Approach for Optical Coherence Tomography–Guided Stent Implantation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Interventional Cardiology Clinics, 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.001, 7:3, (329-344), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018. Kashiwagi M, Tanimoto T and Kitabata H (2018) Severely Circumferentially Calcified Neointima as a New Cause of Undilatable In-Stent Restenosis, Case Reports in Cardiology, 10.1155/2018/5764897, 2018, (1-3), Online publication date: 29-May-2018. Murata N, Takayama T, Hiro T and Hirayama A (2017) Balloon pin-hole rupture during percutaneous coronary intervention for recurrent, calcified in-stent restenosis: A case report, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1002/ccd.27405, 91:7, (1287-1290), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018. Jinnouchi H, Inoue K, Soga Y, Tomoi Y, Kobayashi Y, Hiramori S, Shirai S and Ando K (2017) Pathology of Neointimal Calcification in Very Late Restenosis After Bare Metal Stent Implantation for Superficial Femoral Artery, International Heart Journal, 10.1536/ihj.16-379, 58:4, (641-644), . Tanaka A, Latib A, Jabbour R, Kawamoto H, Giannini F, Ancona M, Regazzoli D, Mangieri A, Mattioli R, Chieffo A, Carlino M, Montorfano M and Colombo A (2016) Impact of Angiographic Result After Predilatation on Outcome After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of In-Stent Coronary Restenosis, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.006, 118:10, (1460-1465), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016. Alfonso F, Cuesta J, Bastante T, Aguilera M, Benedicto A and Rivero F (2016) In-Stent Restenosis Caused by a Calcified Nodule: A Novel Pattern of Neoatherosclerosis, Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.08.014, 32:6, (830.e1-830.e3), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Looser P, Kim L and Feldman D (2016) In-Stent Restenosis: Pathophysiology and Treatment, Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1007/s11936-015-0433-7, 18:2, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016. Bastante T, Rivero F, Cuesta J and Alfonso F (2015) Calcified Neoatherosclerosis Causing "Undilatable" In-Stent Restenosis, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.024, 8:15, (2039-2040), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Alfonso F, Byrne R, Rivero F and Kastrati A (2014) Current Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.545, 63:24, (2659-2673), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014. Vergallo R, Yonetsu T, Uemura S, Park S, Lee S, Kato K, Jia H, Abtahian F, Tian J, Hu S, Lee H, McNulty I, Prasad A, Yu B, Zhang S, Porto I, Biasucci L, Crea F and Jang I (2013) Correlation Between Degree of Neointimal Hyperplasia and Incidence and Characteristics of Neoatherosclerosis as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography, The American Journal of Cardiology, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.076, 112:9, (1315-1321), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2013. Yonetsu T, Kato K, Kim S, Xing L, Jia H, McNulty I, Lee H, Zhang S, Uemura S, Jang Y, Kang S, Park S, Lee S, Yu B, Kakuta T and Jang I (2012) Predictors for Neoatherosclerosis, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 5:5, (660-666), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Yoshida K and Sadamatsu K (2012) A severely calcified neointima 9 years after bare metal stent implantation, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.002, 13:6, (350-352), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012. de la Torre Hernandez J, Rumoroso J, Subinas A, Gonzalo N, Ojeda S, Pan M, Martín Yuste V, Suárez A, Hernández F, Teruel L, Moreu J, Cubero J, Cascón J, Vinhas H, Lozano Í, Martin Moreiras J, Pérez de Prado A, Goicolea J and Escaned J (2017) Percutaneous intervention in chronic total coronary occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: procedural results and long-term clinical outcomes in the TORO (Spanish registry of chronic TOtal occlusion secondary to an occlusive in-stent RestenOsis) multicentre registry, EuroIntervention, 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00764, 13:2, (e219-e226) Her A and Shin E (2018) Current Management of In-Stent Restenosis, Korean Circulation Journal, 10.4070/kcj.2018.0103, 48:5, (337) February 2012Vol 5, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966606PMID: 22338004 Manuscript receivedOctober 23, 2011Manuscript acceptedJanuary 6, 2012Originally publishedFebruary 1, 2012 Keywordsrestenosisrotational atherectomycoronary imagingPDF download Advertisement SubjectsCatheter-Based Coronary and Valvular Interventions

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
20秒前
28秒前
韩帅发布了新的文献求助30
35秒前
小蘑菇应助韩帅采纳,获得10
38秒前
49秒前
59秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
qqq关闭了qqq文献求助
1分钟前
叶知秋完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
研友_LmgOaZ完成签到 ,获得积分0
2分钟前
2分钟前
qqq发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
qqq完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
3分钟前
滕皓轩完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
尔尔发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
4分钟前
在水一方应助尔尔采纳,获得10
4分钟前
完美世界应助微笑的红酒采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
LiangRen完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
微笑的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
今后应助sarmad采纳,获得10
7分钟前
8分钟前
kuoping完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
9分钟前
9分钟前
9分钟前
高分求助中
Rock-Forming Minerals, Volume 3C, Sheet Silicates: Clay Minerals 2000
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 930
The Vladimirov Diaries [by Peter Vladimirov] 600
Development of general formulas for bolted flanges, by E.O. Waters [and others] 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3265472
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2905543
关于积分的说明 8334024
捐赠科研通 2575826
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1400135
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 654702
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 633532