多西紫杉醇
医学
表阿霉素
卡培他滨
内科学
蒽环类
中性粒细胞减少症
转移性乳腺癌
发热性中性粒细胞减少症
养生
紫杉烷
化疗
乳腺癌
胃肠病学
外科
肿瘤科
癌症
结直肠癌
作者
Dimitriοs Mavroudis,Pavlos Papakotoulas,Alexandros Ardavanis,K. Syrigos,S Kakolyris,Nikolaos Ziras,Ch. Kouroussis,Nikolaos Malamos,Aristidis Polyzos,C. Christophyllakis,Nikolaos Kentepozidis,Vassilis Georgoulias
标识
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdp498
摘要
BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).Patients and MethodsPreviously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP).ResultsOne hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3–4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand–foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2–3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively.ConclusionsThe DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI