仆从
纳米孔测序
DNA测序
计算生物学
大规模并行测序
计算机科学
基因组学
杂交基因组组装
生物
深度测序
DNA测序器
DNA
参考基因组
基因组
离子半导体测序
遗传学
基因
作者
Jonathan Foox,Scott Tighe,Charles M. Nicolet,Justin M. Zook,Marta Byrska-Bishop,Wayne E. Clarke,Michael M. Khayat,Medhat Mahmoud,Phoebe K. Laaguiby,Zachary T. Herbert,Derek Warner,George S. Grills,Jin Jen,Shawn Levy,Jenny Xiang,Alicia Alonso,Xia Zhao,Wenwei Zhang,Fei Teng,Yonggang Zhao
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41587-021-01049-5
摘要
Assessing the reproducibility, accuracy and utility of massively parallel DNA sequencing platforms remains an ongoing challenge. Here the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Next-Generation Sequencing Study benchmarks the performance of a set of sequencing instruments (HiSeq/NovaSeq/paired-end 2 × 250-bp chemistry, Ion S5/Proton, PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS), Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION/MinION, BGISEQ-500/MGISEQ-2000 and GS111) on human and bacterial reference DNA samples. Among short-read instruments, HiSeq 4000 and X10 provided the most consistent, highest genome coverage, while BGI/MGISEQ provided the lowest sequencing error rates. The long-read instrument PacBio CCS had the highest reference-based mapping rate and lowest non-mapping rate. The two long-read platforms PacBio CCS and PromethION/MinION showed the best sequence mapping in repeat-rich areas and across homopolymers. NovaSeq 6000 using 2 × 250-bp read chemistry was the most robust instrument for capturing known insertion/deletion events. This study serves as a benchmark for current genomics technologies, as well as a resource to inform experimental design and next-generation sequencing variant calling.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI