Individualizing Nursing Care in the Omics Era

医疗保健 领域 心理干预 惊喜 热情 心理学 未来主义者 医学 护理部 计算机科学 人工智能 社会心理学 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Susan J. Henly
出处
期刊:Nursing Research [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:65 (2): 89-90 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000156
摘要

BUTTERMILK: 8 ounces, every evening at bedtime. That’s the nutrition and comfort intervention one of my undergraduate classmates prescribed on a nursing care plan, circa 1972. In response, her incredulous instructor wrote, “I assume the patient likes this?!?” Apparently, the teacher didn’t share the patient’s enthusiasm for the interesting and unique sensory qualities of buttermilk—a combination of sourness, astringency, yellow–white color, lumpiness, and slow thick flow. Some individuals enjoy the buttermilk experience, and others prefer to avoid it at all costs (cf. Reed & Knaapila, 2010), making the buttermilk treatment a classic example of individualized nursing care. To be effective and cost-effective in improving health, however, individualization needs to go well beyond simply honoring preferences to appreciation of why preferences exist, and how and when they “work” when used as interventions. Today’s precision medicine initiatives extend the individualization long valued in nursing to the broader realm of healthcare. Enabled by new insights from the fast-developing omics sciences, precision healthcare aims to tailor prevention and treatment efforts to the array of unique characteristics that make up an individual (www.whitehouse.gov/precision-medicine). In 2003, the announcement that the human genome had been completely sequenced signaled the start of a new era in the life sciences. Genomics exploded as additional subfields—transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, exposomics, microbiomics, epigenomics—emerged and collectively became known as omics. At first blush, introduction of this new and somewhat unfamiliar sounding terminology into the nursing science lexicon suggests an “addition” to current perspectives or implies that viewpoints that have served the discipline well will need to be “set aside.” Neither is the case. Advances in omics are creating the circumstances needed to fully incorporate biology with psychosocial and behavioral aspects of nursing science to create an in-depth, multiscale, dynamic understanding of health and illness. Arising from integrated knowledge documenting biological and psychosocial-behavioral links—from molecules within cells, to persons within society, over time—care optimized for the individual is envisioned across the range of health services: identification of at-risk individuals, screening and diagnosis, clarification of prognosis, optimization of drug therapy to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize adverse outcomes (Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel et al., 2013), among others. Disorders compromising the health and wreaking havoc on the lives of people today are often thought of as single disorders like “type 2 diabetes,” “hypertension,” or “schizophrenia.” New knowledge about the molecular basis of health conditions is demonstrating the existence of a wide variety of subtypes with similar expression at the level of the person (phenotype) but different underlying pathology; the heterogeneity can be caused by genetic variation or by differences in environmental exposure (creating phenocopies). Symptom expression in response to health conditions is similarly heterogeneous, as is effectiveness of treatments, where what works well for the “average” person doesn’t necessarily work at all for others. Manifestations of research and the knowledge discovery process are changing as omics are being made part of nursing science. Nursing scientists, nurses, patients, and the community at large are collaborating across all phases of research and translation of research findings. Laboratory-based investigations of basic science questions in nursing are becoming more familiar. Research questions are becoming more truly person-centered (idiographic). Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMART), multiphase optimization strategies (MOST), and person-focused designs yet to be invented are revealing protocols for adaptive dosing of treatments for optimal results for individuals or small groups of individuals who share similar characteristics. Technology is enabling new methods of data capture and analysis to make sense of data on a large scale. Uptake of omics perspectives will (should) prompt renewed introspection about the meaning of holism and directions for the development of nursing theory that incorporates health-related phenomena across scales of being and over time. The cost involved in making change in these directions is worthwhile for the benefits they augur: individually optimized interventions for prevention of deleterious health conditions and treatment of health problems. To ensure that individuals, families, communities, and populations benefit from nursing care informed by advances in omics, the next generation of practicing nurses and nursing scientists will need firm schooling in the foundations of these related sciences and their intersections with our discipline (Calzone et al., 2010; Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel et al., 2013). The groundswell of appreciation for the close links between the omics sciences and nursing is prompting intense discussion (Conley & Daack-Hirsch, 2016) about how best to approach integrating omics into nursing science training programs—from prerequisites to course work to faculty and institutional expertise and resources to structures for dissertation committees—to ensure that graduates are well prepared to ask important and relevant questions and launch successful competitive research careers that create new knowledge for practice (Conley et al., 2015; Henly et al., 2015). Nurses first documented their value for personalization of care and belief in its effectiveness by writing nursing care plans based on individual assessment (Henderson, 1973; McCloskey, 1975). Today, in the omics environment, this tradition can be enriched by gaining deeper understanding of the origins of individual differences across the domain of health and illness phenomena and their implications for person-focused nursing interventions for optimizing health and preventing and treating illness.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
务实雁梅完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
香蕉依丝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
华仔应助lou采纳,获得10
2秒前
单刀西施发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
鲤鱼睿渊完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
黄小鸟2333发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
黑皮狗发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
1234645678发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小二郎应助武巧运采纳,获得10
5秒前
zhizhi发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
小明完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
Bob222完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
科目三应助WTT采纳,获得10
10秒前
山南有木兮完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
蔡蔡蔡发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
威武吴完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
上官若男应助holly采纳,获得10
14秒前
李兴完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
碧蓝的汽车完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
周坚强应助aa采纳,获得10
17秒前
在水一方应助黄卡卡采纳,获得10
17秒前
武巧运发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
西瓜太郎君完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
SRn嘿嘿完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
小明发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Yihua完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
wgl501完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
酷酷海豚完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Dryad完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
迟大猫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 800
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
On the identity and nomenclature of a climbing bamboo Melocalamus macclellandii 610
Virulence Mechanisms of Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3557656
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3132706
关于积分的说明 9398807
捐赠科研通 2832886
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1557110
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 727082
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 716189