A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Jenny712完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
丽丽发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
lawang发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
realrrr完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
科研顺利完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
彭于晏应助发多多采纳,获得10
3秒前
蜗牛123发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
赘婿应助David采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
肥皂剧发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
susu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
丰富的莛完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
916应助nabla采纳,获得10
7秒前
李健应助TT提采纳,获得10
9秒前
ww发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
杨梅关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
10秒前
七个小矮人完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
丰富的莛发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
kuichen完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
泓凯骏完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
田様应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
所所应助fordream采纳,获得10
15秒前
CipherSage应助fordream采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
今后应助含糊的冰安采纳,获得10
17秒前
BINGBING1230发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
17秒前
LHF发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
酷波er应助开心不评采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
脑洞疼应助BINGBING1230采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 851
The International Law of the Sea (fourth edition) 800
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
Synthesis and properties of compounds of the type A (III) B2 (VI) X4 (VI), A (III) B4 (V) X7 (VI), and A3 (III) B4 (V) X9 (VI) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5414857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4531710
关于积分的说明 14129736
捐赠科研通 4447140
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2439607
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1431701
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1409315