清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
胖小羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
19秒前
37秒前
柒柒球完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
allrubbish完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
哈扎尔发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
52秒前
55秒前
mmmmmmgm完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
苹果完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
刘玲完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
儒雅的山河完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
两个榴莲完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
jerry完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
通科研完成签到 ,获得积分0
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
MSl发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
MSl完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
李健应助无风采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
时光翩然轻擦完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
Akim应助时光翩然轻擦采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
袁青寒发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
激动的似狮完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
耕牛热完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
郑琦敏钰完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
Determination of the boron concentration in diamond using optical spectroscopy 600
The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations: Digestive System, Volume 9, Part III - Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas (3rd Edition) 600
台灣螢火蟲 500
Founding Fathers The Shaping of America 500
A new house rat (Mammalia: Rodentia: Muridae) from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4541217
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3974881
关于积分的说明 12310977
捐赠科研通 3642163
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2005731
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1041137
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 930365