A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
LC发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
白betty完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
踏实的大地完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Wangyixuan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xiaoxia发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Jane完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
脑洞疼应助酷酷妙梦采纳,获得10
3秒前
cx发布了新的文献求助50
3秒前
Zz发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
花椒bear发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
liu95发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
meimei完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
阿姊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
小马甲应助冷傲迎梦采纳,获得10
4秒前
粗暴的海豚完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
情怀应助sing采纳,获得10
6秒前
星辰大海应助sing采纳,获得10
6秒前
时尚的细菌完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
kytwenxian完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
GH完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Cyneburg完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
王珅君发布了新的文献求助50
7秒前
莫即完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
柑橘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
爆米花应助九鹤采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
爆米花应助小周采纳,获得10
9秒前
不知道完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xiaoxia完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
风雪梧桐完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
ShowMaker应助F-cp采纳,获得10
10秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
wulixin完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小蘑菇应助lvshihao采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
宽禁带半导体紫外光电探测器 388
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY & SKINCARE PRACTICE 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3143003
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2794045
关于积分的说明 7809520
捐赠科研通 2450348
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303779
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627056
版权声明 601384