A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cecilycen完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
李爱国应助人咬兔子采纳,获得10
1秒前
欣喜成仁发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
人间生巧完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Hongmin发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
无情勒完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
武鹏佳发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
芋泥面包完成签到 ,获得积分20
6秒前
1值123发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
Mimi完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
王小狗发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
SciGPT应助Hongmin采纳,获得10
9秒前
孙成成完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
minever白完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
归于晏发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
zhou_发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
FashionBoy应助怕孤单的绿柏采纳,获得10
18秒前
Kyra12完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
cedricleonard发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
脑洞疼应助武鹏佳采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
量子光学理论与实验技术 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5328282
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4468028
关于积分的说明 13903684
捐赠科研通 4360888
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2395399
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1388917
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1359730