亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lim冬青完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
烤羊腿发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
完美世界应助mdjinij采纳,获得10
4秒前
13秒前
balko完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
啊Z完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
mdjinij发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
22秒前
叛逆黑洞发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
似水流年完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
zxxxx完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
大龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
他忽然的人完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
hong关注了科研通微信公众号
35秒前
HH发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
41秒前
上官若男应助HH采纳,获得10
47秒前
check003完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
在水一方应助123456采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
亭瞳发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Charon发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小二郎应助亭瞳采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
wanci应助llll采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
豆子给哒哒哒的求助进行了留言
1分钟前
1分钟前
周召兰完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
yb完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
Methoden des Rechts 600
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5279718
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4434821
关于积分的说明 13805677
捐赠科研通 4314549
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2368079
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1363489
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1326661