A systematic review of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) diagnostic reliability and error

医学 置信区间 梅德林 奇纳 入射(几何) 荟萃分析 队列研究 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 研究异质性 急诊医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 法学 物理 光学 政治学
作者
Emily Larsen,Nicole Gavin,Nicole Marsh,Claire M Rickard,Naomi Runnegar,Joan Webster
出处
期刊:Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:40 (10): 1100-1106 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1017/ice.2019.205
摘要

Abstract Objective: To establish the reliability of the application of National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria within established reporting systems internationally. Design: Diagnostic-test accuracy systematic review. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EbscoHost), and PubMed (NCBI). Cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared publicly reported CLABSI rates and were conducted by independent and expertly trained reviewers using NHSN/Centers for Disease Control (or equivalent) criteria. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS 2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were analyzed. Results: A systematic search identified 1,259 publications; 9 studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 7,160 central lines). Publicly reported CLABSI rates were more likely to be underestimated (7 studies) than overestimated (2 studies). Specificity ranged from 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.81) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sensitivity ranged from 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.72) to 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77–0.95). Four studies, which included a consecutive series of patients (whole cohort), reported CLABSI incidence between 9.8% and 20.9%, and absolute CLABSI rates were underestimated by 3.3%–4.4%. The risk of bias was low to moderate in most included studies. Conclusions: Our findings suggest consistent underestimation of true CLABSI incidence within publicly reported rates, weakening the validity and reliability of surveillance measures. Auditing, education, and adequate resource allocation is necessary to ensure that surveillance data are accurate and suitable for benchmarking and quality improvement measures over time. Registration: Prospectively registered with International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID CRD42015021989; June 7, 2015). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID%3dCRD42015021989
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
LWJ发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
传奇3应助自信的冬日采纳,获得10
1秒前
Hello应助kyJYbs采纳,获得10
2秒前
Rondab应助李大大采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
summer发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
NeoWu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小草blue完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
1111发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
NicheFactor完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
王者归来完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Tin发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
于思枫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
传奇3应助Xwu采纳,获得10
11秒前
叹陌发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
joejo1124发布了新的文献求助50
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
qsmei2020完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
田様应助evefei采纳,获得10
18秒前
优秀芷荷发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
20秒前
彪壮的火车完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
wanwan应助coldsky采纳,获得10
22秒前
yanjiusheng完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
欣欣子完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
江幻天完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Rondab应助彪壮的火车采纳,获得10
26秒前
Ava应助41采纳,获得10
28秒前
十八完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
30秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
SHAO应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 370
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3992040
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3533077
关于积分的说明 11260941
捐赠科研通 3272444
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1805837
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882682
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809425