Optimal dilation time for combined small endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for common bile duct stones: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial

医学 球囊扩张 胆总管 胰腺炎 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术 外科 十二指肠大乳头 临床终点 意向治疗分析 胆管 气球 随机对照试验
作者
Wenbo Meng,Joseph W. Leung,Kai Zhang,Wence Zhou,Zhenyu Wang,Leida Zhang,Hao Sun,Ping Xue,Wei Liu,Qi Wang,Jijun Zhang,Xuefeng Wang,Meng Wang,Yingmei Shao,Kailin Cai,Senlin Hou,Qiyong Li,Lei Zhang,Kexiang Zhu,Ping Yue
出处
期刊:The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:4 (6): 425-434 被引量:43
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30075-5
摘要

Background Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the established treatment for common bile duct stones. Balloon dilation offers an alternative. Prolonged dilation (300 s) with a 10 mm diameter balloon decreases the occurrence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to determine the optimal duration of dilation for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for the removal of common bile duct stones. Methods We did a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial at 15 tertiary surgical centres in China. Eligible patients (≥18 years) with native papilla and common bile duct stones (≤1·5 cm in size and <2 cm in diameter) undergoing ERCP were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive balloon dilation for 0, 30, 60, 180, or 300 s after deep bile duct cannulation. Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list with a block size of ten, stratified by centre. Patients and outcome assessors, but not endoscopists and investigators, were masked to treatment allocation. Balloon dilation was done with controlled radial expansion balloons according to common bile duct stone size. Stones were removed using stone retrieval balloons or baskets. The primary endpoint was overall frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The primary efficacy analysis and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients with successful cannulation, but excluded those who withdrew consent after randomisation. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02510495, and is complete. Findings Between July 29, 2015, and Dec 1, 2017, 3721 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones were recruited, 1718 of whom were excluded. The remaining 2003 patients underwent a small (3–5 mm) endoscopic sphincterotomy. 83 patients withdrew consent after the ERCP procedure, thus 1920 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (0 s [n=371], 30 s [n=384], 60 s [n=388], 180 s [n=390], and 300 s [n=387]). Overall, post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 199 (10%) of 1920 patients (44 [12%] patients in the 0 s group, 28 [7%] in the 30 s group, 32 [8%] in the 60 s group, 36 [9%] in the 180 s group, and 59 [15%] in the 300 s group). Prolonged dilation (300 s) significantly increased the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with shorter balloon dilation (p=0·002). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly lower in the 30, 60, and 180 s groups than in the 300 s group (relative risk [RR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·31–0·73; p=0·0005 vs the 30 s group; 0·54, 0·36–0·81; p=0·003 vs the 60 s group; 0·61, 0·41–0·89; p=0·01 vs the 180 s group). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly higher in the 0 s group than the 30 s group (RR 1·62, 1·04–2·56; p=0·03). No difference in stone extraction (all ≥90%) was observed between groups. Following ERCP, 90 (5%) of 1920 patients had acute cholangitis, 14 (<1%) had acute cholecystitis, and five (<1%) had gastrointestinal bleeding, with no significant differences between groups. One (<1%) patient had Stapfer II perforation, which resolved spontaneously with conservative treatment. Interpretation A balloon dilation time of 30 s for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation reduced the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis and was determined to be the optimum dilation time for the removal of common bile duct stones. Funding National Natural Science Foundation of China, Gansu Competitive Foundation Projects for Technology Development and Innovation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
竹青完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
阔达的水壶完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
cgliuhx完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
小马甲应助动听的蛟凤采纳,获得10
16秒前
房天川完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
aeolianbells完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
Lexi完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
bajiu完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
英俊雅柏完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
popo6150完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
蔷薇完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
欧阳娜娜完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
乐观文龙完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
plucky发布了新的文献求助100
51秒前
51秒前
乐观的星月完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
53秒前
Jimmy发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
鲤鱼念珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
Cissy发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
有何可不完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Cissy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
22K金完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
aran完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2026成功上岸完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
健壮惋清发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
长情的八宝粥完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
深情安青应助健壮惋清采纳,获得10
1分钟前
研友_yLpYkn完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
gj2221423完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
dong完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
沉静的清涟完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
doclarrin完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
陈粒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
我想当太空人完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6028402
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7690218
关于积分的说明 16186463
捐赠科研通 5175575
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2769577
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753048
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638819