医学
心肺复苏术
不要复苏
不复苏命令
复苏令
机构
最高法院
复苏
医疗急救
家庭医学
法学
急诊医学
政治学
作者
Mitchell T. Rabkin,Gerald Gillerman,Nancy R. Rice
标识
DOI:10.1056/nejm197608122950705
摘要
Medical opinions on the inappropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation of certain patients are now openly discussed, as acknowledged by the New Jersey Supreme Court in its recent Quinlan decision. As early as 1974 the AMA proposed that decisions not to resuscitate be formally entered in patients' progress notes and communicated to all attending staff.* There has been little open discussion, however, of the process by which a decision not to resuscitate is formulated. Within a single institution, practices may vary among physicians, in part from the lack of a clearly articulated hospital policy.An apparent need for hospital definitions of the . . .
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI