How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 内科学 法学 护理部 数理经济学 病理 政治 数学 政治学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JamesPei应助tzj采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
充电宝应助赵小坤堃采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
lizishu应助tough_cookie采纳,获得20
1秒前
爆米花应助LIDD采纳,获得10
1秒前
漂亮白枫发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
东方完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
DrugRD发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助蓝天采纳,获得30
3秒前
wanci应助乐观的冬天采纳,获得10
3秒前
大模型应助waddles采纳,获得10
4秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
azw完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
oldeight发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小蘑菇应助111采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
活泼冬天发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研小王发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助jm采纳,获得10
6秒前
共享精神应助虚幻的灵波采纳,获得10
6秒前
ln完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
打打应助饱满的毛巾采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
最爱学习者完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
李兴完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
jack完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
季一完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Eloise完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
传奇3应助Snow886采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.4应助熊熊采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
機能性マイクロ細孔・マイクロ流体デバイスを利用した放射性核種の 分離・溶解・凝集挙動に関する研究 1000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6257939
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8080130
关于积分的说明 16880457
捐赠科研通 5330129
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2837547
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1814870
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1669011