How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 内科学 法学 护理部 数理经济学 病理 政治 数学 政治学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Jasper应助明理丹烟采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
英姑应助卷卷睡采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
洛阳官人完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
皮皮发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
豆腐干地方完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
DouBo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
明天会更好应助Piggy采纳,获得10
8秒前
明天会更好应助Piggy采纳,获得10
8秒前
搜集达人应助Piggy采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
newsl完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
diudiuxin完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
我有一头小毛驴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Orange应助皮皮采纳,获得10
13秒前
璐璐完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
咩咩发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
帅气的杰瑞完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
ddd完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
学无止境完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
风中汽车发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
斯文败类应助aerjin采纳,获得10
20秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助ydxhh采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
xiaochen发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
啥啊完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
彪壮的含双完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
一天三顿拼好饭完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6301797
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8118792
关于积分的说明 16999807
捐赠科研通 5362194
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2848060
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1825650
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679637