How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 内科学 法学 护理部 数理经济学 病理 政治 数学 政治学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
斯文败类应助Dream采纳,获得10
1秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小白果果发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
syy完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
3秒前
666yj完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
呆萌的栗子完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
跳跃的中蓝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
爆米花应助HaHa007采纳,获得10
6秒前
zkk发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小白果果完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
pluto应助xxj采纳,获得10
14秒前
甜美阁完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
gmj完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
yl发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
25秒前
lzq671发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
27秒前
庆庆关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
sleepydoudou完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
susu发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
30秒前
渊珏完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
传奇3应助中科院院士LJJ采纳,获得10
33秒前
开朗的雪珊完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
小镇的废物完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
隐形的西牛完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
39秒前
健壮诗桃发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
活泼的钢铁侠完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
uppercrusteve完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 3000
The impact of workplace variables on juvenile probation officers’ job satisfaction 1000
When the badge of honor holds no meaning anymore 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6282185
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8101013
关于积分的说明 16938182
捐赠科研通 5349153
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2843380
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1820559
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1677486