How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 内科学 法学 护理部 数理经济学 病理 政治 数学 政治学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
酷酷的怀莲完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
jerrylhn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
TTT完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
小乌龟发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
Roy007完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
欢呼的冰蝶完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
无情的孤兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
10秒前
飞鱼发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小白鼠完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
鱼非鱼发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Nicholas完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
陈登完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
青山完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
hahaha完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
兴奋奇异果完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
偶然发现的西柚完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
hahaha发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Akim应助阳光襄采纳,获得10
24秒前
李爱国应助清秀的小刺猬采纳,获得10
25秒前
思源应助111采纳,获得10
26秒前
温柔柜子应助星毅采纳,获得10
26秒前
文件传输助手完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
松松包完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
Future完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
易楠完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
勤劳善良的胖蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
鱼非鱼完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
乐乐应助菜鸡5号采纳,获得20
33秒前
34秒前
YKT完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
阳光襄发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
37秒前
38秒前
40秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 5000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 1000
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6326655
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8143385
关于积分的说明 17075120
捐赠科研通 5380254
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2854344
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1831959
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1683204