How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 内科学 法学 护理部 数理经济学 病理 政治 数学 政治学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
evenish完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
星河发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.1应助1234354346采纳,获得10
5秒前
Epiphany完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
陌陌完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
11秒前
zongzi12138完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
12秒前
勤恳的秋寒完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
ding应助星河采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
心想事成发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
深情安青应助结实冰蓝采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
welch完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
无极微光应助welch采纳,获得20
22秒前
23秒前
DreamMaker完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
CJ1977完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
一二三发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
28秒前
牛马完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
星河发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
机智绝悟完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
bkagyin应助董家旭采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
31秒前
小二郎应助谨慎的秋烟采纳,获得10
32秒前
格物致知发布了新的文献求助50
34秒前
锦李发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
王方玉发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
38秒前
xxx关闭了xxx文献求助
39秒前
39秒前
SciGPT应助真实的如风采纳,获得10
40秒前
桐桐应助蓝天采纳,获得10
42秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines 666
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
The Organization of knowledge in modern America, 1860-1920 / 600
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6360662
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8174744
关于积分的说明 17218973
捐赠科研通 5415693
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2866032
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1843270
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1691337