How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 护理部 数学 数理经济学 病理 政治 政治学 内科学 法学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
今后应助wangs采纳,获得10
1秒前
Wangyicong发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
852应助长情的月光采纳,获得10
2秒前
结实的老虎完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
kingwill应助虚拟采纳,获得20
2秒前
m鹿m嘟啦发布了新的文献求助100
3秒前
健壮的小蘑菇完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Pyrrha完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
西西完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
苯妥英俊发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
彭于晏应助Shellbeaze采纳,获得10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
嘀嘀嘀完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wam完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
BBBF完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
汉堡包应助晨曦采纳,获得10
11秒前
借一颗糖完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ldm发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
aaa福完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科目三应助坚定的芸采纳,获得20
12秒前
喵山王完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
kryptonite发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
SYLH应助zhaxiao采纳,获得10
13秒前
Rondab应助zhaxiao采纳,获得10
13秒前
CAOHOU应助zhaxiao采纳,获得10
13秒前
CAOHOU应助zhaxiao采纳,获得10
13秒前
丘比特应助zhaxiao采纳,获得10
13秒前
何相逢应助shanshanlaichi采纳,获得10
13秒前
苯妥英俊完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
windmill完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 1000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3978852
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3522781
关于积分的说明 11214876
捐赠科研通 3260258
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1799853
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 878711
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 807059