How strong is the evidence supporting the WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in early childhood?

心理干预 观察研究 晋升(国际象棋) 公共卫生 儿童肥胖 健康促进 医学 心理学 结果(博弈论) 肥胖 临床心理学 超重 精神科 护理部 数学 数理经济学 病理 政治 政治学 内科学 法学
作者
Alessandro Bianconi,Matteo Fiore,Enrico Zauli,Cecilia Acuti Martellucci,Annalisa Rosso,Laura Dallolio,Maria Elena Flacco,Lamberto Manzoli
出处
期刊:European Journal of Clinical Investigation [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/eci.14294
摘要

Abstract Background The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation. Methods All data for each exposure‐outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result. Results Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure‐outcome associations. Sixty‐two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity‐related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high‐quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
兴奋的天蓉完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
传奇3应助Shaw采纳,获得10
1秒前
wanci应助元谷雪采纳,获得10
2秒前
whuyyz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zhuding1978完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
逗逗完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
空白格完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
SilverPlane完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Rainlistener应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
xfy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
感动水杯完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Rainlistener应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
Rainlistener应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
冷漠的布丁完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
重要的小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
李伟发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
明天又是美好的一天完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
HAO发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
bobo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
茄子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
hyfwkd完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
顺利毕业发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
BrandNew。发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
10秒前
牛牛完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
JMrider发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
快乐真完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5698917
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5127463
关于积分的说明 15223160
捐赠科研通 4853889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2604380
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1555868
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1514197