通用数据保护条例
软件可移植性
竞争法
1998年数据保护法
背景(考古学)
法律与经济学
竞赛(生物学)
范围(计算机科学)
业务
法学
政治学
计算机科学
经济
微观经济学
垄断
程序设计语言
古生物学
生物
生态学
出处
期刊:European Law Review
[Definitive International Institute of Life Science (DIILI Publication)]
日期:2017-12-01
卷期号: (6): 793-814
被引量:2
摘要
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces a right to data portability in the EU legal order. This novel right has no direct equivalent in EU Member States, or internationally. Data portability bears many of the trappings of a competition law remedy: it has the potential to reduce barriers to entry; to stimulate innovation; and, to lower switching costs for individuals. For this reason, the right to data portability is often attributed a competition-based rationale in addition to its data protection objective. Yet, as this paper shall demonstrate, the GDPR right to data portability can be differentiated from a competition law remedy in terms of both its scope and its objectives. These differences in terms of scope and normative logic can lead to conflicting interpretations and visions of the right to data portability. This paper argues that in case of such conflict the interpretation of the GDPR right to data portability ought to be decoupled from the logic and constraints of competition law and instead viewed within its data protection law context as an instrument for individual control over personal data.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI