作者
Laura Vang Rasmussen,Ingo Graß,Zia Mehrabi,Olivia M. Smith,Rachel Bezner Kerr,Jennifer Blesh,Lucas A. Garibaldi,Marney E. Isaac,Christina M. Kennedy,Hannah Wittman,Péter Batáry,Damayanti Buchori,Rolando Cerda,Julián Chará,David W. Crowder,Kevin Darras,Kathryn Teigen DeMaster,Karina García,Manuel Gómez,David J. Gonthier,Purnama Hidayat,Juliana Hipólito,Mark Hirons,Lesli Hoey,Dana James,Innocensia John,Andrew D. Jones,Daniel S. Karp,Yodit Kebede,Carmen Bezner Kerr,Susanna Klassen,Martyna M. Kotowska,Holger Kreft,Ramiro Llanque,Christian Levers,Diego J. Lizcano,Adrian Lu,Sidney Madsen,Rosebelly Nunes Marques,Pedro Buss Martins,América Melo,Hanson Nyantakyi‐Frimpong,Elissa M. Olimpi,Jeb P. Owen,Heiber Alexander Pantévez,Matin Qaim,Sarah Redlich,Christoph Scherber,Amber R. Sciligo,Sieglinde S. Snapp,William E. Snyder,Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter,Anne Elise Stratton,Joseph Taylor,Teja Tscharntke,Vivian Valencia,Cassandra Vogel,Claire Kremen
摘要
Agricultural simplification continues to expand at the expense of more diverse forms of agriculture. This simplification, for example, in the form of intensively managed monocultures, poses a risk to keeping the world within safe and just Earth system boundaries. Here, we estimated how agricultural diversification simultaneously affects social and environmental outcomes. Drawing from 24 studies in 11 countries across 2655 farms, we show how five diversification strategies focusing on livestock, crops, soils, noncrop plantings, and water conservation benefit social (e.g., human well-being, yields, and food security) and environmental (e.g., biodiversity, ecosystem services, and reduced environmental externalities) outcomes. We found that applying multiple diversification strategies creates more positive outcomes than individual management strategies alone. To realize these benefits, well-designed policies are needed to incentivize the adoption of multiple diversification strategies in unison.