作者
Jie Chen,Danielle Braun,Tanya Christidis,Michael A. Cork,Sophia Rodopoulou,Evangelia Samoli,Massimo Stafoggia,Kathrin Wolf,Xiao Wu,Weiran Yuchi,Zorana Jovanovic Andersen,Richard Atkinson,Mariska Bauwelinck,Kees de Hoogh,Nicole Janssen,Klea Katsouyanni,Jochem O. Klompmaker,Doris Tove Kristoffersen,Youn‐Hee Lim,Bente Oftedal,Maciej Strak,Danielle Vienneau,Jiawei Zhang,Richard T. Burnett,Gerard Hoek,Francesca Dominici,Michael Bräuer,Bert Brunekreef
摘要
Studies across the globe generally reported increased mortality risks associated with particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5μm (PM2.5) exposure with large heterogeneity in the magnitude of reported associations and the shape of concentration-response functions (CRFs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of key study design factors (including confounders, applied exposure model, population age, and outcome definition) on PM2.5 effect estimates by harmonizing analyses on three previously published large studies in Canada [Mortality-Air Pollution Associations in Low Exposure Environments (MAPLE), 1991–2016], the United States (Medicare, 2000–2016), and Europe [Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE), 2000–2016] as much as possible.