Impact of deprescribing dual-purpose medications on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 折旧 奇纳 荟萃分析 相对风险 梅德林 指南 随机对照试验 系统回顾 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 心理信息 多药 急诊医学 重症监护医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Shakti Shrestha,Arjun Poudel,Magnolia Cardona,Kathryn J. Steadman,Lisa Nissen
出处
期刊:Therapeutic advances in drug safety [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:12: 204209862110523-204209862110523 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1177/20420986211052343
摘要

Introduction: The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (dual-purpose medications or DPMs) is often challenging for clinicians. We aim to establish the impact of deprescribing DPMs on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life (EOL). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Literature was searched on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar until December 2019 for studies on deprescribing intervention with a control group (with or without randomisation); targeting ⩾65-year olds, at EOL, with at least one life-limiting illness and at least one potentially inappropriate DPM. We were interested in any patient-related outcomes. Studies with similar outcome assessment criteria were subjected to meta-analysis and narrative synthesis otherwise. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental non-randomised controlled studies, respectively. Results: Five studies covering 689 participants with mean age 81.6–85.7 years, the majority (74.6–100%) with dementia were included. The risk of bias was moderate to low. The deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–0.79) and referral to acute care facilities (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22–0.73), but did not have a significant impact on the risk of falls, non-vertebral fracture, emergency presentation, unplanned hospital admission, or general practitioner visits. No significant difference was observed in the quality of life, physical and cognitive functions between the intervention and control groups. Conclusion: There is some evidence that deprescribing of DPMs for older adults near the EOL can lower the risk of mortality and referral to acute care facilities, but there are insufficient good-quality studies powered to confirm a benefit in terms of quality of life, physical or cognitive function, health service utilisation and adverse events. Plain Language Summary What is the health impact of withdrawal or dose reduction of medication used for disease prevention and symptom control in older adults near end-of-life? Introduction: Older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with advanced diseases such as cancer, dementia, and organ failure tend to have a limited life expectancy. With the progression of these diseases towards the end-of-life, the intensity for day-to-day supportive care becomes increasingly necessary. The use of medications for symptom management is a critical part of such care, but the use of medications for long-term disease prevention can become irrelevant due to the already shortened life expectancy and may become harmful due to alterations in physiology and pharmacology associated with age and frailty. This necessitates the withdrawal or dose reduction of inappropriate medications, the process called deprescribing. The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (DPMs) in this population is often challenging for clinicians. In this context, whether deprescribing of DPMs can improve patient-related health outcomes is unknown. Methods: Evidence from the literature was reviewed and analysed, and the quality of studies was assessed. Five studies were identified, which had 689 participants with an average age above 80 years and mostly suffering from dementia. Results: The analysis of these studies showed deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of death and referral to acute care facilities at 12 months but had no significant impact on falls, non-vertebral fractures, emergency presentations, unplanned hospital admission, general practitioner visits, quality of life, physical and mental functions. Conclusion: In conclusion, there were insufficient numbers of high-quality studies powered to confirm whether deprescribing of DPMs reduces adverse events, health service use, or improves the quality of life or functioning in older adults near the end of life.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dasfdufos发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Annie发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
CipherSage应助WU采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
韧战发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
咕噜咕噜噜熊完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
炙热短靴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
呃呃呃c发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
谨慎建辉发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
脑洞疼应助1sxc采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
chen完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
321完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
传奇3应助zzzdx采纳,获得10
12秒前
orixero应助王景晨采纳,获得10
12秒前
绵绵发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
YZ发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
传奇3应助孤独曲奇采纳,获得10
15秒前
刘家成发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
郑光英发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
赘婿应助平淡的萤采纳,获得10
18秒前
WU发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
orixero应助dasfdufos采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
酒酿圆子发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
慕青应助刘家成采纳,获得10
22秒前
乾巧完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
anan发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
an完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Fermented Coffee Market 2000
微纳米加工技术及其应用 500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life 4th Edition 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 420
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5288858
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4440637
关于积分的说明 13825255
捐赠科研通 4322964
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2372842
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1368324
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1332194