Impact of deprescribing dual-purpose medications on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 折旧 奇纳 荟萃分析 相对风险 梅德林 指南 随机对照试验 系统回顾 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 心理信息 多药 急诊医学 重症监护医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Shakti Shrestha,Arjun Poudel,Magnolia Cardona,Kathryn J. Steadman,Lisa Nissen
出处
期刊:Therapeutic advances in drug safety [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:12: 204209862110523-204209862110523 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1177/20420986211052343
摘要

Introduction: The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (dual-purpose medications or DPMs) is often challenging for clinicians. We aim to establish the impact of deprescribing DPMs on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life (EOL). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Literature was searched on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar until December 2019 for studies on deprescribing intervention with a control group (with or without randomisation); targeting ⩾65-year olds, at EOL, with at least one life-limiting illness and at least one potentially inappropriate DPM. We were interested in any patient-related outcomes. Studies with similar outcome assessment criteria were subjected to meta-analysis and narrative synthesis otherwise. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental non-randomised controlled studies, respectively. Results: Five studies covering 689 participants with mean age 81.6–85.7 years, the majority (74.6–100%) with dementia were included. The risk of bias was moderate to low. The deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–0.79) and referral to acute care facilities (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22–0.73), but did not have a significant impact on the risk of falls, non-vertebral fracture, emergency presentation, unplanned hospital admission, or general practitioner visits. No significant difference was observed in the quality of life, physical and cognitive functions between the intervention and control groups. Conclusion: There is some evidence that deprescribing of DPMs for older adults near the EOL can lower the risk of mortality and referral to acute care facilities, but there are insufficient good-quality studies powered to confirm a benefit in terms of quality of life, physical or cognitive function, health service utilisation and adverse events. Plain Language Summary What is the health impact of withdrawal or dose reduction of medication used for disease prevention and symptom control in older adults near end-of-life? Introduction: Older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with advanced diseases such as cancer, dementia, and organ failure tend to have a limited life expectancy. With the progression of these diseases towards the end-of-life, the intensity for day-to-day supportive care becomes increasingly necessary. The use of medications for symptom management is a critical part of such care, but the use of medications for long-term disease prevention can become irrelevant due to the already shortened life expectancy and may become harmful due to alterations in physiology and pharmacology associated with age and frailty. This necessitates the withdrawal or dose reduction of inappropriate medications, the process called deprescribing. The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (DPMs) in this population is often challenging for clinicians. In this context, whether deprescribing of DPMs can improve patient-related health outcomes is unknown. Methods: Evidence from the literature was reviewed and analysed, and the quality of studies was assessed. Five studies were identified, which had 689 participants with an average age above 80 years and mostly suffering from dementia. Results: The analysis of these studies showed deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of death and referral to acute care facilities at 12 months but had no significant impact on falls, non-vertebral fractures, emergency presentations, unplanned hospital admission, general practitioner visits, quality of life, physical and mental functions. Conclusion: In conclusion, there were insufficient numbers of high-quality studies powered to confirm whether deprescribing of DPMs reduces adverse events, health service use, or improves the quality of life or functioning in older adults near the end of life.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
小小兔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Wang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
张雯雯发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
刘天宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
受伤丹妗发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
852应助123456采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
秀丽友灵完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
莫里发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
loomcool完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yznfly应助Thor采纳,获得20
5秒前
7秒前
pocky发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
李爱国应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
8秒前
此时此刻发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
阳光青文发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
梁皓然完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
hu发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
10秒前
辉仔完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
粥粥完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
nanami完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
cyanpomelo应助大尾猫采纳,获得10
12秒前
zhengshanbei发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Akim应助zhuzhu的江湖采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
酷波er应助执着的小熊猫采纳,获得10
14秒前
SciGPT应助执着的小熊猫采纳,获得10
14秒前
桐桐应助梁皓然采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
调皮紫文发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
所所应助jtyt采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
Christian Women in Chinese Society: The Anglican Story 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3961408
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3507744
关于积分的说明 11137921
捐赠科研通 3240204
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1790848
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872587
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803288