Impact of deprescribing dual-purpose medications on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 折旧 奇纳 荟萃分析 相对风险 梅德林 指南 随机对照试验 系统回顾 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 心理信息 多药 急诊医学 重症监护医学 内科学 心理干预 精神科 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Shakti Shrestha,Arjun Poudel,Magnolia Cardona,Kathryn J. Steadman,Lisa Nissen
出处
期刊:Therapeutic advances in drug safety [SAGE]
卷期号:12: 204209862110523-204209862110523 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1177/20420986211052343
摘要

Introduction: The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (dual-purpose medications or DPMs) is often challenging for clinicians. We aim to establish the impact of deprescribing DPMs on patient-related outcomes for older adults near end-of-life (EOL). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Literature was searched on PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar until December 2019 for studies on deprescribing intervention with a control group (with or without randomisation); targeting ⩾65-year olds, at EOL, with at least one life-limiting illness and at least one potentially inappropriate DPM. We were interested in any patient-related outcomes. Studies with similar outcome assessment criteria were subjected to meta-analysis and narrative synthesis otherwise. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental non-randomised controlled studies, respectively. Results: Five studies covering 689 participants with mean age 81.6–85.7 years, the majority (74.6–100%) with dementia were included. The risk of bias was moderate to low. The deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–0.79) and referral to acute care facilities (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.22–0.73), but did not have a significant impact on the risk of falls, non-vertebral fracture, emergency presentation, unplanned hospital admission, or general practitioner visits. No significant difference was observed in the quality of life, physical and cognitive functions between the intervention and control groups. Conclusion: There is some evidence that deprescribing of DPMs for older adults near the EOL can lower the risk of mortality and referral to acute care facilities, but there are insufficient good-quality studies powered to confirm a benefit in terms of quality of life, physical or cognitive function, health service utilisation and adverse events. Plain Language Summary What is the health impact of withdrawal or dose reduction of medication used for disease prevention and symptom control in older adults near end-of-life? Introduction: Older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with advanced diseases such as cancer, dementia, and organ failure tend to have a limited life expectancy. With the progression of these diseases towards the end-of-life, the intensity for day-to-day supportive care becomes increasingly necessary. The use of medications for symptom management is a critical part of such care, but the use of medications for long-term disease prevention can become irrelevant due to the already shortened life expectancy and may become harmful due to alterations in physiology and pharmacology associated with age and frailty. This necessitates the withdrawal or dose reduction of inappropriate medications, the process called deprescribing. The decision to deprescribe medications used for both disease prevention and symptom control (DPMs) in this population is often challenging for clinicians. In this context, whether deprescribing of DPMs can improve patient-related health outcomes is unknown. Methods: Evidence from the literature was reviewed and analysed, and the quality of studies was assessed. Five studies were identified, which had 689 participants with an average age above 80 years and mostly suffering from dementia. Results: The analysis of these studies showed deprescribing of DPMs lowered the risk of death and referral to acute care facilities at 12 months but had no significant impact on falls, non-vertebral fractures, emergency presentations, unplanned hospital admission, general practitioner visits, quality of life, physical and mental functions. Conclusion: In conclusion, there were insufficient numbers of high-quality studies powered to confirm whether deprescribing of DPMs reduces adverse events, health service use, or improves the quality of life or functioning in older adults near the end of life.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
大豆终结者完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
赘婿应助虚幻龙猫采纳,获得10
1秒前
粗心小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
smash完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
mawenxing完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
社会你董哥完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
满意冰露发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
霖槿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
aaaaaah发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
ZHN发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Li完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
比目鱼发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
英俊的铭应助jin晨采纳,获得10
7秒前
情怀应助飞快的丸子采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
dawei完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
奋斗的元正关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
爱笑的秋寒完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
研友_LwlAgn发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
直率铁身完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
西红柿发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
路瑶瑶完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
虚幻龙猫发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
SciGPT应助殷勤的惜寒采纳,获得10
14秒前
smash关注了科研通微信公众号
15秒前
君衡完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1020
Impiego dell’associazione acetazolamide/pentossifillina nel trattamento dell’ipoacusia improvvisa idiopatica in pazienti affetti da glaucoma cronico 900
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
錢鍾書楊絳親友書札 600
Geochemistry, 2nd Edition 地球化学经典教科书第二版,不要epub版本 431
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3295827
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2931687
关于积分的说明 8453434
捐赠科研通 2604320
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1421619
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 661066
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 644023