Use of lymph node ratio improves staging and selection criteria for adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer

医学 淋巴结 危险系数 癌症 内科学 比例危险模型 监测、流行病学和最终结果 人口 流行病学 肿瘤科 阶段(地层学) 癌症分期 辅助治疗 置信区间 癌症登记处 古生物学 环境卫生 生物
作者
Natalie G. Coburn,Carol J. Swallow,Alex Kiss,Calvin Law
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [American Society of Clinical Oncology]
卷期号:24 (18_suppl): 4051-4051 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.4051
摘要

4051 Background: Despite 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines stipulating assessment of ≥15 lymph nodes (LN) for staging of gastric cancer, only one third of patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1998–2002 had ≥15 LN assessed (ASCO 2005 #4004), with resultant understaging and probable under-treatment. In series from Asia and Europe, Lymph Node Ratio (LNR), the ratio of positive to total LN assessed, has been shown to be more accurate for staging than number of positive LN. However, most of these excluded cases with <15 LN assessed. We examined the utility of LNR in a North American population. Methods: Using SEER data, we identified 9503 M0 resected gastric cancer cases from 1988–2002. LNR was categorized as 0%, 1–10%, 11–30%, 31–50% and >50%. For node negative cases (LNR = 0%, n = 3652), we stratified by number of LN assessed (A=1–4; B = 5–9; C = 10–14; D≥15). For each AJCC stage or LNR strata, the degree of understaging in patients with inadequate LN assessment was measured by survival difference on Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) models determined the effect of stratifying node negative patients and the accuracy of LNR for prognostication. Results: 27% of patients had a LNR > 50%, a high proportion compared to Asian series. Fewer nodes assessed resulted in a higher likelihood of being node negative. In node negative cases, the HR of death increased for those with fewer LN assessed (vs. Group D, with 95% CI): A: HR=1.6 (1.5–1.8); B: HR = 1.3 (1.1–1.5); C: HR = 1.3 (1.1–1.5). Understaging was observed for patients with inadequate LN assessment when AJCC criteria were used (p < 0.0001); this effect significantly decreased by using LNR. LNR had superior prognostic accuracy in Cox models. Conclusions: This study examines LNR in the largest series of resected gastric cancer in the literature, and the only one in which the majority of cases were inadequately staged. LNR significantly decreases understaging and improves prognostic ability. Node negative patients, nearly one third of cases, should be risk stratified by number of LN assessed, and considered for adjuvant therapy on this basis. LNR should be used to stratify node positive patients in clinical trials, and to provide more accurate staging and prognostication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CodeCraft应助端庄的白开水采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
哲寒发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
JYHui发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
我的Diy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI5应助鄢廷芮采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
wei完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科目三应助叨叨采纳,获得10
4秒前
深情安青应助Ki采纳,获得10
4秒前
呼安发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
健忘的迎夏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
西瓜籽发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
Dickson完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
朴实的薯片完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
杨树发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
优秀井完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
天天365完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Dickson发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
un完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
一昂杨完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
轧路机啊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
hhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助李梓权采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
所所应助繁星采纳,获得30
12秒前
Juli完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
ame1120发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Novel synthetic routes for multiple bond formation between Si, Ge, and Sn and the d- and p-block elements 700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3515049
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3097391
关于积分的说明 9235300
捐赠科研通 2792358
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1532422
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 712063
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 707107