Interpreting device diagnostics for lead failure

医学 除颤 高阻抗 休克(循环) 电阻抗 铅(地质) 植入式心律转复除颤器 心脏病学 内科学 电气工程 工程类 地貌学 地质学
作者
Charles D. Swerdlow,Sylvain Ploux,Jeanne E. Poole,Sandeep G. Nair,Adam Himes,Kenneth A. Ellenbogen
出处
期刊:Heart Rhythm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:19 (1): 154-164 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.09.027
摘要

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) incorporate automated, lead-monitoring alerts (alerts) and other diagnostics to detect defibrillation lead failure (LF) and minimize its adverse clinical consequences. Partial conductor fractures cause oversensing, but pacing or high-voltage alerts for high impedance detect only complete conductor fracture. In both pacing and high-voltage insulation breaches, low-impedance alerts require complete breach with metal-to-metal contact. Oversensing alerts for pace-sense LF also require complete breach, but not metal-to metal contact. Electrograms (EGMs) from leads with confirmed fractures have characteristics findings. In insulation breach, however, oversensed EGMs reflect characteristics of the source signal. Oversensing alerts that operate on the sensing channel analyze R-R intervals for 2 patterns typical of LF but uncommon in other conditions: a rapidly increasing count of "nonphysiological" short intervals and rapid "nonsustained tachycardias." These alerts are sensitive but nonspecific. Alerts that compare sensing and shock channels define oversensing as sensed events that do not correlate temporally with EGMs on the shock channel. Their performance depends on implementation. Specific advantages and limitations are reviewed. Most ICDs measure impedance using subthreshold pulses. Patterns in impedance trends provide diagnostic information, whether or not an alert is triggered. Gradual increases in impedance do not indicate structural LF, but they may cause failed defibrillation if shock impedance is high enough. Because impedance-threshold alerts are insensitive, normal impedance trends never exclude LF, but an abrupt increase that triggers an alert almost always indicates a header connection issue or LF. Methods for discriminating connection issues from LF are reviewed. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) incorporate automated, lead-monitoring alerts (alerts) and other diagnostics to detect defibrillation lead failure (LF) and minimize its adverse clinical consequences. Partial conductor fractures cause oversensing, but pacing or high-voltage alerts for high impedance detect only complete conductor fracture. In both pacing and high-voltage insulation breaches, low-impedance alerts require complete breach with metal-to-metal contact. Oversensing alerts for pace-sense LF also require complete breach, but not metal-to metal contact. Electrograms (EGMs) from leads with confirmed fractures have characteristics findings. In insulation breach, however, oversensed EGMs reflect characteristics of the source signal. Oversensing alerts that operate on the sensing channel analyze R-R intervals for 2 patterns typical of LF but uncommon in other conditions: a rapidly increasing count of "nonphysiological" short intervals and rapid "nonsustained tachycardias." These alerts are sensitive but nonspecific. Alerts that compare sensing and shock channels define oversensing as sensed events that do not correlate temporally with EGMs on the shock channel. Their performance depends on implementation. Specific advantages and limitations are reviewed. Most ICDs measure impedance using subthreshold pulses. Patterns in impedance trends provide diagnostic information, whether or not an alert is triggered. Gradual increases in impedance do not indicate structural LF, but they may cause failed defibrillation if shock impedance is high enough. Because impedance-threshold alerts are insensitive, normal impedance trends never exclude LF, but an abrupt increase that triggers an alert almost always indicates a header connection issue or LF. Methods for discriminating connection issues from LF are reviewed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
JeKing发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
旺旺发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
lihuahui发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
qiqi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
西洲发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
D16完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
杨先生发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
CodeCraft应助黑猫黑猫采纳,获得10
3秒前
Xianhe发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
平常海云发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
风犬少年完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
fei发布了新的文献求助100
4秒前
ddd应助cfw采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
自有龙骧完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
JamesPei应助123采纳,获得10
5秒前
ding应助冷酷的毛豆采纳,获得10
6秒前
研友_ZragOn发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
有趣的桃发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
蛋烘糕完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
飘飘完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
PhiLEason发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
好想睡懒觉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
wefsef发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Lucas应助mingming采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
xx完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
共享精神应助长情代玉采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
Electric machines: theory, operating applications, and controls 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
When Is Two-Stage Sample Robust Optimization Asymptotically Optimal? 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7601208
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9177637
关于积分的说明 19652347
捐赠科研通 7177072
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268825
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2433125
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2262478