左乙拉西坦
安慰剂
医学
荟萃分析
不利影响
癫痫
优势比
随机对照试验
相对风险
内科学
精神科
置信区间
病理
替代医学
作者
Gashirai K Mbizvo,Bharath Chandrasekar,Sarah J Nevitt,Pete Dixon,Jane L Hutton,Anthony G Marson
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn.171
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant levetiracetam in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. This is an update to the 2001 and 2012 reviews. Methods The search included the Cochrane Register of Studies and MEDLINE to 09/2018 for randomised, placebo-controlled trials of add-on levetiracetam in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Two authors indepen- dently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments. Outcomes included ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (response) and adverse effects. We performed Mantel-Haenszel meta-analyses for risk ratios (RR), with 95% CI (99% for adverse effects). We assessed heterogeneity using I². Results This update includes 14 trials (three more than the previous update), assessing 2,452 participants (296 children). Risks of bias were predominantly low. There were important levels of heterogeneity across multiple comparisons. There were two new findings: 1) Levetiracetam at either 500 mg/day or 4000 mg/day did not perform better than placebo for response (500 mg: RR 1.60, CI 0.71–3.62; 4000 mg: RR 1.64, CI 0.59–4.57). Levetiracetam was significantly better than placebo at all other individual doses (1000–3000 mg). 2) Odds of achieving response were increased by nearly 40% (odds ratio 1.39, CI 1.23–1.58) for each 1000 mg increase in dose of levetiracetam. Somnolence remained the most common adverse effect, and changes in behaviour were negligible overall. Conclusions It seems reasonable to continue using levetiracetam in drug-resistant focal epilepsy, 10a2lthough a 500-mg dose may be no more effective than placebo. mbizvogkm@gmail.com
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI