作者
Thomas H. Dohlman,Matthew J. McSoley,Francisco Amparo,Tatiana Carreno-Galeano,Mengyu Wang,Mohammad H. Dastjerdi,Rohan Bir Singh,Giulia Coco,Antonio Di Zazzo,Hasanain Shikari,Ujwala Saboo,Kimberly Sippel,Jessica Ciralsky,Sonia H. Yoo,Matheus Sticca,Tais Hitomi Wakamatsu,Somasheila Murthy,Pedram Hamrah,Ula Jurkunas,Joseph B. Ciolino,José Álvaro Pereira Gomes,Victor L. Perez,Jia Yin,Reza Dana
摘要
Purpose
To determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation. Design
Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil. Participants
Patients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft. Methods
Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measure
The 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate. Results
Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis. Conclusions
In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection.