医学
肝细胞癌
肝移植
内科学
米兰标准
单中心
比例危险模型
胃肠病学
接收机工作特性
人口
癌
移植
肿瘤科
外科
环境卫生
作者
Chase J. Wehrle,Roma Raj,Marianna Maspero,Sangeeta Satish,Bijan Eghtesad,Alejandro Pita,Jaekeun Kim,Mazhar Khalil,Esteban Calderon,Danny Orabi,Bobby Zervos,Jamak Modaresi Esfeh,Maureen Whitsett Linganna,Teresa Diago‐Uso,Masato Fujiki,Cristiano Quintini,Choonhyuck David Kwon,Charles C. Miller,Antonio Pinna,Federico Aucejo,Koji Hashimoto,Andrea Schlegel
标识
DOI:10.1097/js9.0000000000001104
摘要
Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there are ongoing debates regarding outcomes and selection. This study examines the experience of LT for HCC at a high-volume center.A prospectively maintained database was used to identify HCC patients undergoing LT from 2000-2020 with>3 years follow-up. Data was obtained from the center database and electronic medical records. The Metroticket 2.0 HCC-specific five-year survival scale was calculated for each patient. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were employed assessing survival between groups based on Metroticket score and individual donor and recipient risk factors.569 patients met criteria. Median follow-up was 96.2 months (8.12 y; IQR 59.9-147.8). Three-year recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 88.6% (n=504) and 86.6% (n=493). Five-year RFS and OS were 78.9% (n=449) and 79.1% (n=450). Median Metroticket 2.0 score was 0.9 (IQR 0.9-0.95). Tumor size>3 cm (P=0.012), increasing tumor number on imaging (P=0.001) and explant pathology (P<0.001) was associated with recurrence. Transplant within Milan (P<0.001) or UCSF-criteria (P<0.001) had lower recurrence rates. Increasing AFP-values were associated with more HCC-recurrence (P<0.001) and reduced OS (P=0.008). Chemoembolization was predictive of recurrence in the overall population (P=0.043) and in those outside Milan criteria (P=0.038). A receiver-operator curve using Metroticket 2.0 identified an optimal cut-off of projected survival>87.5% for predicting recurrence. This cut-off was able to predict RFS (P<0.001) in the total cohort and predict both, RFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.016) outside-Milan. Receipt of donation after brain death (DBD) grafts (55/478, 13%) or living-donor grafts (3/22, 13.6%) experienced better survival rates compared to donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts (n=15/58, 25.6%, P=0.009). Donor age was associated with a higher HCC-recurrence (P=0.006). Both total ischemia time (TIT)>6hours (P=0.016) and increasing TIT correlated with higher HCC-recurrence (P=0.027). The use of DCD-grafts for outside-Milan candidates was associated with increased recurrence (P=0.039) and reduced survival (P=0.033).This large two-center analysis confirms favorable outcomes after LT for HCC. Tumor size and number, pre-transplant AFP, and Milan criteria remain important recipient HCC-risk factors. A higher donor risk (i.e., donor age, DCD-grafts, ischemia time) was associated with poorer outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI