LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

医学 肝细胞癌 恶性肿瘤 荟萃分析 优势比 逻辑回归 放射科 置信区间 内科学
作者
Haben Dawit,Eric Lam,Matthew D. F. McInnes,Christian B. van der Pol,Mustafa R. Bashir,Jean‐Paul Salameh,Brooke Levis,Claude B. Sirlin,Victoria Chernyak,Sang Hyun Choi,So Yeon Kim,Tyler J. Fraum,An Tang,Hanyu Jiang,Bin Song,Jin Wang,Stephanie R. Wilson,Heejin Kwon,Andrea S. Kierans,Ijin Joo,Maxime Ronot,Ji Soo Song,Joanna Podgórska,Grzegorz Rosiak,Zhen Kang,Brian C. Allen,Andreu F. Costa
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:310 (2) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.231501
摘要

Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
纷纷故事完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
哲999发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
麦苳完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
汉堡包应助JIE采纳,获得10
1秒前
伏地魔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
yyf完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
XWT完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
虚安完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
xqy完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
啵乐乐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
慕青应助饕餮1235采纳,获得10
4秒前
小蘑菇应助CC采纳,获得10
5秒前
白白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
苏苏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
MADKAI发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
李健的小迷弟应助111采纳,获得10
8秒前
Accept应助wintercyan采纳,获得20
8秒前
哲999完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Mian完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
于嗣濠完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
36456657应助CC采纳,获得10
9秒前
优雅山柏发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Jacky完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
脑洞疼应助无情的白桃采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527521
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107606
关于积分的说明 9286171
捐赠科研通 2805329
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539901
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716827
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709740