医学
最小临床重要差异
正式舞会
天花板效应
患者报告的结果
临床意义
患者满意度
物理疗法
统计显著性
人口
外科
随机对照试验
生活质量(医疗保健)
内科学
替代医学
环境卫生
护理部
病理
产科
作者
Joshua D. Harris,Jefferson C. Brand,Mark P. Cote,Brian R. Waterman,Aman Dhawan
出处
期刊:Arthroscopy
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-02-01
卷期号:39 (2): 145-150
被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.020
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) need to be responsive, reliable, and validated for the specific condition or treatment. PROMs also need to exhibit a dose-dependent response across a diverse patient population, unlimited by floor and ceiling effects. Statistically significant differences between compared groups might not always represent clinically important differences. Measures of clinical significance reflect a spectrum of patient satisfaction after an intervention. A noticeable difference to the patient is assessed with minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient satisfaction by patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and a "considerable" improvement by substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Clinical relevance measured by these clinically significant outcomes (CSO) are limited by ceiling effects. Maximal outcome improvement (MOI) might more accurately account for patients with higher baseline or preoperative PROMs, thereby limiting ceiling effects. The acts of measuring (and reporting) patient-centered endpoints may actually be of greater importance than collecting objective clinician-measured data. As the old surgeon's aphorism goes, "nothing ruins good results like good follow-up."
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI