医学
急诊医学
工作量
外科
计算机科学
操作系统
作者
Richard Saczkowski,Saverio Spada,Kris Hromadnik
出处
期刊:Perfusion
[SAGE]
日期:2023-02-07
卷期号:39 (3): 506-513
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/02676591221149858
摘要
Introduction The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is one of the most utilized cardiac assist devices. Patients receiving IABP therapy are typically managed in high acuity clinical care areas with limited bed space and high demand. Our center instituted a certified clinical perfusionist (CCP) led initiative to remove IABP catheters in order to reduce IABP therapy time, hasten removal and improve efficiency. Methods The purpose of the study is to compare outcomes for IABP removal by a certified clinical perfusionist to a physician. The primary outcome measures were site hematoma score and limb related complications. A survey was submitted to bedside nurses, managers/patient care coordinators, CCP’s and physicians. The IABP quality assurance database was interrogated for the study. Results There were 350 patients eligible for inclusion. The cohort was well balanced between CCP ( n = 284) and physician ( n = 66) groups for patient demographics, indication, insertion specifics and type of medical intervention. The majority of patients had no bruise or hematoma with perfusionist ( n = 246, 87%) or physician ( n = 58, 88%) ( p = 0.78) removal. The physician group demonstrated a higher rate of grade 3 hematomas ( p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between CCP and physician groups for limb complications and mortality. Survey results showed an improved efficiency in bed space allocation, physician workload and a decreased IABP support time. Conclusion There is no difference in limb complications between perfusionist and physician removal of IABP catheters. The survey demonstrate an improvement in resource allocation and efficiency. A perfusionist led IABP removal program can be done safely and may help improve program efficiency.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI