动脉瘤
医学
放射科
统计显著性
前瞻性队列研究
临床意义
血管造影
外科
内科学
作者
Manasi Ramachandran,Rohini Retarekar,Madhavan L. Raghavan,Benjamin Berkowitz,Benjamin Dickerhoff,Tatiana Correa,Steve Lin,Kevin M. Johnson,David Hasan,Christopher S. Ogilvy,Robert H. Rosenwasser,James C. Torner,Einar Bogason,Christopher J. Stapleton,Robert E. Harbaugh
标识
DOI:10.3171/2015.2.jns142265
摘要
OBJECT The goal of this prospective longitudinal study was to test whether image-derived metrics can differentiate unruptured aneurysms that will become unstable (grow and/or rupture) from those that will remain stable. METHODS One hundred seventy-eight patients harboring 198 unruptured cerebral aneurysms for whom clinical observation and follow-up with imaging surveillance was recommended at 4 clinical centers were prospectively recruited into this study. Imaging data (predominantly CT angiography) at initial presentation was recorded. Computational geometry was used to estimate numerous metrics of aneurysm morphology that described the size and shape of the aneurysm. The nonlinear, finite element method was used to estimate uniform pressure-induced peak wall tension. Computational fluid dynamics was used to estimate blood flow metrics. The median follow-up period was 645 days. Longitudinal outcome data on these aneurysm patients—whether their aneurysms grew or ruptured (the unstable group) or remained unchanged (the stable group)—was documented based on follow-up at 4 years after the beginning of recruitment. RESULTS Twenty aneurysms (10.1%) grew, but none ruptured. One hundred forty-nine aneurysms (75.3%) remained stable and 29 (14.6%) were lost to follow-up. None of the metrics—including aneurysm size, nonsphericity index, peak wall tension, and low shear stress area—differentiated the stable from unstable groups with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS The findings in this highly selected group do not support the hypothesis that image-derived metrics can predict aneurysm growth in patients who have been selected for observation and imaging surveillance. If aneurysm shape is a significant determinant of invasive versus expectant management, selection bias is a key limitation of this study.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI