作者
Murphy Mc,Amanda F. Mejia,Jorge Mejía,Xiaoran Yan,Sapna Cheryan,Nilanjana Dasgupta,Mesmin Destin,Stephanie A. Fryberg,Julie A. García,Elizabeth L. Haines,Judith M. Harackiewicz,Alison Ledgerwood,Corinne A. Moss‐Racusin,Lora E. Park,Sylvia Perry,Kate A. Ratliff,Aneeta Rattan,Diana T. Sanchez,Krishna Savani,Denise Sekaquaptewa,Jessi L. Smith,Valerie Jones Taylor,Dustin B. Thoman,Daryl A. Wout,Patricia L. Mabry,Susanne Ressl,Amanda B. Diekman,Franco Pestilli
摘要
Significance Science is rapidly changing with the current movement to improve science focused largely on reproducibility/replicability and open science practices. Through network modeling and semantic analysis, this article provides an initial exploration of the structure, cultural frames of collaboration and prosociality, and representation of women in the open science and reproducibility literatures. Network analyses reveal that the open science and reproducibility literatures are emerging relatively independently with few common papers or authors. Open science has a more collaborative structure and includes more explicit language reflecting communality and prosociality than does reproducibility. Finally, women publish more frequently in high-status author positions within open science compared with reproducibility. Implications for cultivating a diverse, collaborative culture of science are discussed.