Diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

荟萃分析 医学 接收机工作特性 超声波 子群分析 诊断优势比 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 置信区间 梅德林 出版偏见 优势比 放射科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Aymeric Le Neindre,François Philippart,Marta Luperto,Johan Wormser,Johanna Morel-Sapene,Serge Aho,Silvia Mongodi,Francesco Mojoli,Bélaïd Bouhemad
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier]
卷期号:117: 103890-103890 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103890
摘要

The accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting weaning outcome is still debated, despite the publication of numerous studies evaluating this issue. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting weaning failure in critically ill patients. MEDLINE, Science direct, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched. Two investigators independently selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and three extracted data and performed a bias analysis using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 instrument. A bivariate model was used to estimate the pooled results for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. Sources of heterogeneity were explored, and subgroup analyses were performed. Twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, from which 16 studies (816 patients in total) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve were 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.80), 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.91), and 0.82 (95% Cl 0.78–0.85) for diaphragm thickening fraction, respectively, and 0.71 (95% CI 0.61–0.79), 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.86), and 0.82 (95% Cl 0.79–0.86) for diaphragm excursion, respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity among the studies. Meta-regression highlighted significant effects of prevalence of extubation failure, cut-off and risk of bias in flow and timing of the study on diaphragm ultrasound accuracy. By excluding outlier and influential studies, sensitivity was lower and specificity higher for diaphragm thickening fraction. The specificity of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting the risk of extubation failure in critically ill patients was moderate-to-high. However, sensitivity was low because weaning is also affected by non-diaphragm-related factors. Further research in subgroups of critically ill patients applying a homogeneous definition of weaning and uniformly conducted measure is needed to assess the accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound. Registered on http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42017058028. Tweetable abstract: Diaphragm ultrasound predicts extubation failure with high specificity. Absence of diaphragm dysfunction does not imply no risk of extubation failure.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赵赵完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
共享精神应助lalala采纳,获得10
刚刚
Hello应助hf采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
豆丁完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
鹿友菌完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
皮克斯完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
黑米粥发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
iu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
脑洞疼应助KX采纳,获得10
3秒前
大模型应助艺玲采纳,获得10
4秒前
ZXD完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
丞诺完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Ricardo完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
深情安青应助孔雀翎采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
端庄的萝完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
平淡南霜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助ppbb采纳,获得10
6秒前
Mr_Hao发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
fff发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
CC发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
eee发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
HEIKU应助xinxinqi采纳,获得10
9秒前
keroro完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助宋嬴一采纳,获得10
9秒前
祯果粒完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
王大炮完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
不厌完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
feifei关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
11秒前
香菜完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
鲸是海蓝色完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527304
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107454
关于积分的说明 9285518
捐赠科研通 2805269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539827
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716708
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709672