Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 医学 毒物控制 人口 相对风险 自杀预防 伤害预防 梅德林 人口学 精神科 内科学 医疗急救 环境卫生 社会学 法学 政治学
作者
Thomas Niederkrotenthaler,Marlies Braun,Jane Pirkis,Benedikt Till,Steven Stack,Mark Sinyor,Ulrich S. Tran,Martin Voracek,Qijin Cheng,Florian Arendt,Sebastian Scherr,Paul S. F. Yip,Matthew J. Spittal
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.m575
摘要

Abstract Objective To examine the association between reporting on suicides, especially deaths of celebrities by suicide, and subsequent suicides in the general population. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed/Medline, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, searched up to September 2019. Review methods Studies were included if they compared at least one time point before and one time point after media reports on suicide; follow-up was two months or less; the outcome was death by suicide; and the media reports were about non-fictional suicides. Data from studies adopting an interrupted time series design, or single or multiple arm before and after comparisons, were reviewed. Results 31 studies were identified and analysed, and 20 studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the main analyses. The risk of suicide increased by 13% in the period after the media reported a death of a celebrity by suicide (rate ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.18; 14 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 7-60 days). When the suicide method used by the celebrity was reported, there was an associated 30% increase in deaths by the same method (rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.44; 11 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 14-60 days). For general reporting of suicide, the rate ratio was 1.002 (0.997 to 1.008; five studies; median follow-up 1 day, range 1-8 days) for a one article increase in the number of reports on suicide. Heterogeneity was large and partially explained by celebrity and methodological factors. Enhanced funnel plots suggested some publication bias in the literature. Conclusions Reporting of deaths of celebrities by suicide appears to have made a meaningful impact on total suicides in the general population. The effect was larger for increases by the same method as used by the celebrity. General reporting of suicide did not appear to be associated with suicide although associations for certain types of reporting cannot be excluded. The best available intervention at the population level to deal with the harmful effects of media reports is guidelines for responsible reporting. These guidelines should be more widely implemented and promoted, especially when reporting on deaths of celebrities by suicide. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019086559.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
吴佳庆完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI5应助浅渊采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
天天快乐应助夏天采纳,获得10
3秒前
QQQ发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
7秒前
淡定怜南完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Kyoemji发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
赘婿应助哔噗哔噗采纳,获得10
8秒前
uu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
zzt发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
能干亦玉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Hello应助机智谷蕊采纳,获得10
9秒前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
ghn123456789发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
吴佳庆发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
汉堡包应助飞飞飞采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
夏天完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
打打应助夕夕口口采纳,获得10
15秒前
ZHH完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
玛卡巴卡发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
单薄树叶完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
夏天发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
wgr发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
lele关注了科研通微信公众号
23秒前
可爱的函函应助MW采纳,获得10
23秒前
浅渊发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 700
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Effective Learning and Mental Wellbeing 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3975922
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3520226
关于积分的说明 11201711
捐赠科研通 3256720
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1798423
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 877576
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 806452