Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 医学 毒物控制 人口 相对风险 自杀预防 伤害预防 梅德林 人口学 精神科 内科学 医疗急救 环境卫生 社会学 法学 政治学
作者
Thomas Niederkrotenthaler,Marlies Braun,Jane Pirkis,Benedikt Till,Steven Stack,Mark Sinyor,Ulrich S. Tran,Martin Voracek,Qijin Cheng,Florian Arendt,Sebastian Scherr,Paul S. F. Yip,Matthew J. Spittal
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.m575
摘要

Abstract Objective To examine the association between reporting on suicides, especially deaths of celebrities by suicide, and subsequent suicides in the general population. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed/Medline, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, searched up to September 2019. Review methods Studies were included if they compared at least one time point before and one time point after media reports on suicide; follow-up was two months or less; the outcome was death by suicide; and the media reports were about non-fictional suicides. Data from studies adopting an interrupted time series design, or single or multiple arm before and after comparisons, were reviewed. Results 31 studies were identified and analysed, and 20 studies at moderate risk of bias were included in the main analyses. The risk of suicide increased by 13% in the period after the media reported a death of a celebrity by suicide (rate ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.18; 14 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 7-60 days). When the suicide method used by the celebrity was reported, there was an associated 30% increase in deaths by the same method (rate ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.44; 11 studies; median follow-up 28 days, range 14-60 days). For general reporting of suicide, the rate ratio was 1.002 (0.997 to 1.008; five studies; median follow-up 1 day, range 1-8 days) for a one article increase in the number of reports on suicide. Heterogeneity was large and partially explained by celebrity and methodological factors. Enhanced funnel plots suggested some publication bias in the literature. Conclusions Reporting of deaths of celebrities by suicide appears to have made a meaningful impact on total suicides in the general population. The effect was larger for increases by the same method as used by the celebrity. General reporting of suicide did not appear to be associated with suicide although associations for certain types of reporting cannot be excluded. The best available intervention at the population level to deal with the harmful effects of media reports is guidelines for responsible reporting. These guidelines should be more widely implemented and promoted, especially when reporting on deaths of celebrities by suicide. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019086559.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
Owen应助帅气绮露采纳,获得10
1秒前
小马甲应助Ttttt采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
maox1aoxin应助albert采纳,获得30
6秒前
李青松发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
zhanzhanzhan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
轩辕忆枫发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Dx发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
小甜瓜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
Jasper应助樊川采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
幸福的kc完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
CipherSage应助高贵季节采纳,获得10
16秒前
单薄水壶给ccc123的求助进行了留言
17秒前
帅气绮露发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
隐形曼青应助zhanzhanzhan采纳,获得10
18秒前
幸福的kc发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
zydddg发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
桐桐应助搞怪的归尘采纳,获得30
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助myg8627采纳,获得10
22秒前
buxixi发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
李健应助幸福的kc采纳,获得10
24秒前
酷波er应助幸福的kc采纳,获得10
24秒前
Zhu_77发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
阳光皮带完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Singularity应助高哈哈哈采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
李爱国应助xuanxuan采纳,获得20
28秒前
28秒前
29秒前
帅气绮露完成签到,获得积分20
30秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Le dégorgement réflexe des Acridiens 800
Defense against predation 800
XAFS for Everyone (2nd Edition) 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3133576
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2784593
关于积分的说明 7767642
捐赠科研通 2439774
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1297049
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 624839
版权声明 600791