贝伐单抗
医学
多西紫杉醇
内科学
肺癌
化疗
肿瘤科
随机对照试验
作者
Kazumi Nishino,Fumio Imamura,Toru Kumagai,Nobuyuki Katakami,Akito Hata,Chiyuki Okuda,Yoshiko Urata,Y. Hattori,Motoko Tachihara,Souichirou Yokota,Takashi Nishimura,Toshihiko Kaneda,Miyako Satouchi,Satoshi Morita,Shunichi Negoro
出处
期刊:Lung Cancer
[Elsevier]
日期:2015-08-01
卷期号:89 (2): 146-153
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.05.022
摘要
Objectives This randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus bevacizumab and S-1 plus bevacizumab in the second-line treatment of non-squamous (non-Sq) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods Patients with non-Sq NSCLC who experienced disease progression after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus bevacizumab (DB) once every 3 weeks or S-1 orally twice daily on days 1–14 plus bevacizumab (SB) on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression. Results Ninety patients were randomized. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.0–6.5) in DB and 3.5 months (95% CI = 2.9–5.9) in SB. The objective response rate was significantly higher in DB than in SB (22.2% vs. 2.2%; P = 0.004), whereas the disease control rates of the arms were identical (62.2% vs. 62.2%; P = 1.00). Patients receiving DB were more likely to have ≥grade 3 neutropenia (93.4% vs. 4.4%) and febrile neutropenia (33.3% vs. 0%) than SB. In DB, PFS and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer among bevacizumab-naïve patients than among bevacizumab-experienced patients (median PFS: 7.2 vs. 2.9 months; P = 0.004; and median OS: 21.3 vs. 14.1 months; P = 0.012). Conclusion DB and SB produced modest PFS benefits in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-Sq NSCLC. Because of the toxicity of DB and the low response rate of SB, neither regimen warrants further investigation, excluding DB in bevacizumab-naïve patients with advanced non-Sq NSCLC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI