亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide

节育 人口 莫尔斯 政治 禁忌 法学 犯罪学 社会学 政治学 计划生育 人口学 研究方法
作者
Andrew E. Slaby
出处
期刊:Psychiatric Services [American Psychiatric Association Publishing]
卷期号:52 (1): 114-115 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.114-a
摘要

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Book ReviewsFull AccessFatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of SuicideAndrew E. Slaby, M.D., Ph.D.Andrew E. SlabySearch for more papers by this author, M.D., Ph.D.Published Online:1 Jan 2001https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.1.114-aAboutSectionsView EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Few people spark as explosive discussion of the right to suicide as Thomas Szasz, author of The Myth of Mental Illness. In Fatal Freedom we find repeated Szasz's earlier criticism of medicine in general and of psychiatry in particular. Religious mores, health standards, and civil law naturally are affected by evolving cultural and political dictates, as discussed by Tancredi and myself (1) and others. Birth control, abortion, and homosexuality are taboo in societies requiring high birth rates for economic growth, physical protection, and social welfare of family members at times of population attrition due to the ravages of war, famine, and illness. Once a society has stabilized, population increases can be destructive, and practices that limit the birth rate are encouraged: population containment is valued. Hence birth control, abortion, and homosexuality, once sins or crimes, may be encouraged or passively accepted, as Tancredi and I have explained.Sanctions against suicide, however, are not quite so simplistic. At a time when advances in medical science allow prolongation of life beyond a point where quality of life is acceptable, I agree with Szasz that some individuals of sound mind and judgment may elect to die rather than suffer. People have the right to a living will limiting the use of extraordinary life-saving measures. Unlike Szasz, however, I believe psychiatric disorders distort thought, mood, and judgment, limiting informed choice and leading to outcomes that would not occur in the absence of a potentially treatable illness. Psychiatric disorders, not physicians or families, restrict informed choice in these instances.In spite of these criticisms, Szasz should be heard. As he notes, Nazi Germany employed a medical rationale to kill Jews, homosexuals, and the psychiatrically disturbed. Soviet psychiatrists hospitalized political dissidents. Physicians can be transformed from "protector(s) of the individual patient into the patient's prosecutor in the service of the State." Birth control may be approved, but we do not automatically impugn individual competence to protective contraception and do not try to interfere with people's behavior on the ground they are not competent to decide in such a matter. Szasz feels that irresponsible procreation is more deleterious to society than impulsive suicide, and therefore "if we regard the coercive regulation of birth control as morally odious and legally impermissible, as indeed we should, then we ought to regard the coercive regulation of death control as even more odious and impermissible." Prohibiting death control, he feels, reduces personal responsibility for prohibited behaviors, making people more dependent on external control than self-control.Most suicidologists, including myself, contend that profoundly depressed people do not have that self-control. Those who die by suicide do not want to die, they want to end their pain. If they could perceive another way to do so, they would seek it. But they cannot perceive or seek it, and therein lies the physician's and family's responsibility to help them do so.Dr. Slaby is clinical professor of psychiatry at the New York University and New York Medical College and past president of the American Association of Suicidology.by Thomas Szasz; Praeger Publishers, Westport, Connecticut, 1999, 177 pages, $25.95Reference1. Slaby AE, Tancredi LR: Collusion for Conformity. New York, Aronson, 1975Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byNone Volume 52Issue 1 January 2001Pages 114-a-115 Metrics History Published online 1 January 2001 Published in print 1 January 2001

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1437594843完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
明理丹烟应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
明理丹烟应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
30秒前
哭泣的丝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
隐形问萍完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
隐形问萍发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
信勇完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
明理丹烟应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Jing发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
3分钟前
Raunio完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助小白菜采纳,获得30
3分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
小白菜发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
赎罪完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Puan发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
ma发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
Alicia完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
郑夏岚完成签到,获得积分20
7分钟前
314gjj完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
daishuheng完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
uss完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
徐芳菲完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8分钟前
逝水完成签到 ,获得积分10
9分钟前
MET1应助ma采纳,获得10
10分钟前
spark810完成签到 ,获得积分0
10分钟前
明理丹烟应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
千早爱音完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
asdf完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
爆米花应助机灵的衫采纳,获得30
11分钟前
高分求助中
中国国际图书贸易总公司40周年纪念文集 大事记1949-1987 2000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
草地生态学 880
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 799
Basic Modern Theory of Linear Complex Analytic 𝑞-Difference Equations 510
中国有机(类)肥料 500
Queer Politics in Times of New Authoritarianisms: Popular Culture in South Asia 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3059522
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2715495
关于积分的说明 7445289
捐赠科研通 2361022
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1251174
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 607698
版权声明 596448