Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
柒柒完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
愉快睫毛发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
zzzz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
swheepig发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
宙大的陨石坑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
风飒飒完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6.4应助mikoo采纳,获得10
5秒前
mikejefy完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
光明磊落完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助高兴的笑珊采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI6.4应助嫣然一笑采纳,获得10
6秒前
sheilaa完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
tramp发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
完美世界应助活泼晓啸采纳,获得10
8秒前
852应助佟佳霖采纳,获得10
8秒前
Ava应助NanoMo采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
跳跃青曼完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
李健应助GAP采纳,获得10
10秒前
Ava应助千千千千千千青采纳,获得10
10秒前
qqqq发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
橘子sungua完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Xavii发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
充电宝应助Ao采纳,获得10
11秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
Haruna关注了科研通微信公众号
12秒前
跳跃青曼发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
FLY发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
晓晓完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
白石人家应助即兴采纳,获得10
13秒前
谢晨园完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
江江江发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1314
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7737543
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9286822
关于积分的说明 20180095
捐赠科研通 7315366
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3305586
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457870
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2315205