Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
漂亮板栗完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
elisa828发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小二郎应助we采纳,获得10
3秒前
NexusExplorer应助二三采纳,获得30
5秒前
无极微光完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
薛定谔的猫爱摸鱼完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
huang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小杨完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
飞翔的鸣完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
17秒前
we完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小荣同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
we发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
叶问夏完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
天成浩子完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
卞卞完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
隐形荟完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
天庚地寅完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
zzzz完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
zyb完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
二三发布了新的文献求助30
38秒前
小暴完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
YHBBZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
苏逸完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
xcwy完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
43秒前
kevinrnk完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
哈吉米曼波完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
谨慎纸飞机完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
zky发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
MGraceLi_sci完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
xiaowangwang完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
PP关闭了PP文献求助
54秒前
呵呵喊我完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
文静的行恶完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
YongLiu完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
顾矜应助we采纳,获得30
58秒前
MrL完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
受不了12345完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
Materials Informatics Molecules, Crystals and Beyond A volume in Acta Materialia Book Series 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7043612
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8710220
关于积分的说明 18445078
捐赠科研通 6555770
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3117616
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2202245
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2093027