Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
正直的煎饼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
羞涩的诗柳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
幽默的季节完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
聪慧晓丝发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
小王院士完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
du发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
充电宝应助Bluestar采纳,获得10
4秒前
大朵拉发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
大方舞蹈完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
行走的荷尔蒙应助遇见采纳,获得30
7秒前
芷诺完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
ube关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
哈哈哈54188完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
幸福电灯胆完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
上官若男应助野烟采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
大个应助阮小粒采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
情怀应助肖鹏采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
踏实一德应助hc采纳,获得10
14秒前
尘归尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
华仔应助冷落清秋采纳,获得10
15秒前
bi8bo应助yu采纳,获得10
15秒前
魍尚完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
耳东完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7533496
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9119044
关于积分的说明 19480196
捐赠科研通 7133247
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3256951
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2424388
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2244665