Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
张欢馨应助nav采纳,获得10
刚刚
充电宝应助wwwww采纳,获得10
刚刚
烟花应助wwwww采纳,获得10
刚刚
orixero应助wwwww采纳,获得10
刚刚
星星发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
研友_VZG7GZ应助wwwww采纳,获得10
刚刚
CipherSage应助wwwww采纳,获得10
刚刚
ding应助wwwww采纳,获得10
1秒前
大个应助wwwww采纳,获得10
1秒前
桐桐应助wwwww采纳,获得10
1秒前
Owen应助wwwww采纳,获得10
1秒前
molihuakai应助wwwww采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
项脊轩完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
树小夏完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
激昂的逊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
lillian完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Cindy165完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Nuyoah发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
文城完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
梦与叶落完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Zml200123发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
more完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
automan完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
凌晨一点的莱茵猫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
芒果完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
FY发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7614533
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9189908
关于积分的说明 19690645
捐赠科研通 7187315
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3271145
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434499
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2266144