Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
隐形曼青应助自觉的听白采纳,获得10
1秒前
舒适蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wxr发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
CipherSage应助sharon采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
G0zz1发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
符先生发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科目三应助秀秀采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
彩色的平露完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
kls发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
英俊的铭应助Ethereal采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
大西瓜发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
顾矜应助fjkssadjk采纳,获得10
4秒前
完美世界应助歪歪扣叉采纳,获得10
4秒前
只会完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
巫马语柳发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Dy发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
Gray发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Ava应助YuenYuen采纳,获得10
5秒前
活泼芷文发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小鹿5460发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
乐乐应助典雅的火采纳,获得10
6秒前
小马甲应助kls采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
儒雅天磊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
传奇3应助美好眼神采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
osooo发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
xxxx_w发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6017491
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7602483
关于积分的说明 16156153
捐赠科研通 5165311
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764854
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746169
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635193