Evaluation of an Enhanced Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 肺康复 随机对照试验 物理疗法 慢性阻塞性肺病 生活质量(医疗保健) 康复 内科学 护理部
作者
Anne‐Marie Selzler,Tina Jourdain,Joshua Wald,Maria Sedeno,Tania Janaudis‐Ferreira,Roger Goldstein,Jean Bourbeau,Michael K. Stickland
出处
期刊:Annals of the American Thoracic Society [American Thoracic Society]
卷期号:18 (10): 1650-1660 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1513/annalsats.202009-1160oc
摘要

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the most effective strategy to improve health outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it has had limited success in promoting sustained physical activity. PR with a strong focus on disease self-management may better facilitate long-term behavior change. Objectives: To compare a newly developed enhanced PR (EPR) program with a traditional PR program on outcome achievement. Methods: In this randomized parallel-group controlled trial, PR classes were block-randomized to EPR or traditional PR and were delivered over 16 sessions each. The EPR program incorporated new and updated "Living Well with COPD" education modules, which had a stronger focus on chronic disease self-management. Fidelity of the intervention for content and delivery was assessed. Physical activity, self-efficacy, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected before, after, and 6 months after PR. Healthcare visits were collected 2 years before PR and 1 year after. Mortality was recorded 1 year after PR. Results: Of the 207 patients with COPD enrolled, 108 received EPR and 99 received traditional PR. Physical activity (steps) and self-efficacy improved from before to after PR in both programs, with no differences between groups. These effects were not sustained at 6 months. Exercise tolerance and HRQoL improved from before to after PR with no between-group differences and were maintained at 6 months. Visits to primary care providers and respiratory specialists decreased in the EPR program relative to the traditional PR program. EPR was delivered as intended, and there was no meaningful cross-contamination between the two programs. Conclusions: Enhancing PR to have a greater emphasis on chronic disease self-management did not result in a superior improvement of physical activity and health outcomes compared with traditional PR except for reduced resource usage from primary and specialist physician visits in the EPR program.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02917915).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zink完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
机灵怀蝶完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Lucas应助李十四采纳,获得10
2秒前
邋遢大王完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
风趣蜜蜂发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
路宽宽完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
May发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
dadadada发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
财路通八方完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
游隼儿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
纪复天完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
hvacr123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
黎笛发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Troye发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
淡淡的孤菱给淡淡的孤菱的求助进行了留言
13秒前
正直的以冬完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
文静灵阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
华仔应助折木浮华采纳,获得10
15秒前
踏实煎蛋完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
优秀扬完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7551906
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9134785
关于积分的说明 19520633
捐赠科研通 7143822
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3260241
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2426999
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2249308