医学
甲状腺切除术
前庭系统
甲状腺癌
乳晕
解剖(医学)
外科
淋巴结
回顾性队列研究
甲状腺
普通外科
放射科
内科学
作者
Weidong Zhang,Lei Dai,Yingchun Wang,Yun-Yun Xie,Jian-Yao Guo,Jianjun Li,Xintao Wu
出处
期刊:Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-03-17
卷期号:31 (5): 550-553
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/sle.0000000000000932
摘要
Background: Endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach (ETA) has been widely used in thyroidectomy for many years as it can effectively avoid a scar in the neck. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is newly applied and has gained popularity quickly. This study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of TOETVA and ETA. Materials and Methods: A total of 95 patients who underwent TOETVA or ETA with unilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this study from March 2019 to February 2020. The basic information (such as gender, age), intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative drainage volume, hospital durations, intraoperative and postoperative complications, operative time, central lymph node dissection time, total number of central lymph nodes, and number of metastatic central lymph nodes were compared. Results: The operative time of the TOETVA group was significantly longer than the ETA group (148.11±19.78 vs. 135.90±12.77 min, P <0.05). However, the result was opposite when central lymph node dissection time was compared (10.31±2.93 vs. 12.48±3.55, P <0.05). TOETVA had an advantage on total number of central lymph nodes over ETA (7.82±3.35 vs. 5.26±2.45, P <0.05). No differences were found between the 2 groups on other data. Conclusion: TOETVA and ETA have the similarity on surgical safety and effectiveness. TOETVA has its advantage on central lymph node dissection and might be a reasonable alternative for ETA and open surgery in the future.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI