Health-related quality of life with pembrolizumab or placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (KEYNOTE-826): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

医学 贝伐单抗 彭布罗利珠单抗 安慰剂 卡铂 临床终点 化疗 肿瘤科 宫颈癌 内科学 临床试验 外科 癌症 顺铂 免疫疗法 替代医学 病理
作者
Bradley J. Monk,Krishnansu S. Tewari,Coraline Dubot,M. Valeria Cáceres,Kosei Hasegawa,Ronnie Shapira‐Frommer,Pamela Salman,Eduardo Yañez,Mahmut Gümüş,Mivael Olivera,Vanessa Samouëlian,Vincent Castonguay,Arkhipov Alexander,Cumhur Tekin,Kan Li,Allison Martin Nguyen,Matthew Monberg,Nicoletta Colombo,Domenica Lorusso
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:24 (4): 392-402 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00052-9
摘要

BackgroundIn the KEYNOTE-826 study, the addition of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab improved overall survival and progression-free survival (primary endpoints) versus placebo plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with manageable toxicity, in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. In this Article, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-826.MethodsKEYNOTE-826 is a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial in 151 cancer treatment centres in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy (previous radiosensitising chemotherapy was allowed) and not amenable to curative treatment and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of an interactive voice response system in a double-blind manner to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks intravenously for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min, intravenously) with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously. Randomisation (block size of 4) was stratified by metastatic disease at diagnosis, planned bevacizumab use, and PD-L1 combined positive score. Patients, investigators, and other study personnel involved in study treatment administration or clinical evaluation of patients were unaware of treatment group assignments. PRO instruments were the EORTC Quality-of-Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the EORTC cervical cancer module (QLQ-CX24), and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) visual analogue scale, each collected before treatment at cycles 1–14 and every other cycle thereafter. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by investigator review. Change from baseline in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)–quality of life (QoL) was a prespecified secondary endpoint and was assessed in the PRO full analysis population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment). Other PRO analyses were protocol-specified exploratory endpoints. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03635567, and is ongoing.FindingsBetween Nov 20, 2018, and Jan 31, 2020, of 883 patients screened, 617 were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab group, n=308; placebo group, n=309). 587 (95%) of 617 patients received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one post-baseline PRO assessment and were therefore included in the PRO analyses (pembrolizumab group, n=290; placebo group, n=297). Median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 19·1–24·4). At week 30, QLQ-C30 completion was 199 (69%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 168 (57%) of 297 patients in the placebo group; compliance was 199 (94%) of 211 and 168 (90%) of 186, respectively. The least squares mean change in QLQ-C30 GHS–QoL score from baseline to week 30 was −0·3 points (95% CI −3·1 to 2·6) in the pembrolizumab group and −1·3 points (−4·2 to 1·7) in the placebo group, with a between-group difference in least squares mean change of 1·0 point (95% CI −2·7 to 4·7). Median time to true deterioration in GHS–QoL was not reached (NR; 95% CI 13·4 months–NR) in the pembrolizumab group and 12·9 months (6·6–NR) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65–1·09]). 122 (42%) of 290 patients in the pembrolizumab group versus 85 (29%) of 297 in the placebo group had improved GHS–QoL at any time during the study (p=0·0003).InterpretationAddition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab did not negatively affect health-related quality of life. Along with the efficacy and safety results already reported from KEYNOTE-826, these data support the benefit of pembrolizumab and the value of immunotherapy in patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer.FundingMerck Sharp & Dohme.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
星辰大海应助初一采纳,获得30
2秒前
英俊的铭应助G1234采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
斯文败类应助Yeah_椰椰采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
7秒前
9秒前
pluto应助九月清晨采纳,获得10
10秒前
pluto应助九月清晨采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
大碗完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
HEHXU发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Struggle完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
ming完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
二行发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
lalalahei发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
20秒前
wh完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
24秒前
HEHXU完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
lmmen发布了新的文献求助100
25秒前
哼哼哈嘿发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
刘汐完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
28秒前
F.T发布了新的文献求助20
28秒前
lalalahei完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
川川完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
Rex发布了新的文献求助20
32秒前
yu发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
李健应助ljforever采纳,获得10
33秒前
34秒前
35秒前
36秒前
金鑫水淼完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
Weirder than Sci-fi: Speculative Practice in Art and Finance 960
Resilience of a Nation: A History of the Military in Rwanda 888
Massenspiele, Massenbewegungen. NS-Thingspiel, Arbeiterweibespiel und olympisches Zeremoniell 500
Essentials of Performance Analysis in Sport 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3727967
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3273048
关于积分的说明 9979641
捐赠科研通 2988422
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1639628
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 778825
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 747819