拉米夫定
医学
恩曲他滨
成本效益分析
替诺福韦
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)
内科学
利比韦林
成本效益
药理学
病毒载量
病毒学
抗逆转录病毒疗法
慢性肝炎
病毒
风险分析(工程)
作者
E. Pyadushkina,Elena Derkach,Vladimir Rozenberg,Dzhumber Ugrekhelidze,Alena Lobodina,Carl Baxter,Andrew Beyer
标识
DOI:10.1080/14737167.2022.2117162
摘要
In Russia, before 2022, the list of vital and essential drugs for HIV-infected patients previously untreated with antiretroviral drugs included the fixed-dose combination rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (RPV/TDF/FTC) but not doravirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine (DOR/TDF/3TC).An indirect comparison of the efficacy of DOR/TDF/3TC and RPV/TDF/FTC defined by virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA of <50 copies/mL at week 48) was made. The per-patient drug costs over 1 year were compared in a cost-minimization analysis. A budget impact analysis considered the costs to the healthcare system of including DOR/TDF/3TC as a treatment option for eligible patients in Russia over a 3-year time horizon.The indirect treatment comparison of DOR/TDF/3TC and RPV/TDF/FTC in treatment-naïve patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA 100,000 copies/ml or less showed no statistically significant difference (RR 0.914, 95% CI 0.833-1.003). In the cost-minimization analysis, the per-patient cost of one year of treatment with RPV/TDF/FTC and DOR/TDF/3TC was, respectively, ₽320,975 and ₽151,192, for a saving of ₽169,783. In the budget impact analysis, the adoption of DOR/TDF/3TC into clinical practice is expected to reduce drug costs by ₽333 million (23.8%) in year 3.Fixed-dose combination DOR/TDF/3TC is equally effective and cost-saving compared to RPV/TDF/FTC from Russian vital and essential drugs list perspective.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI