The response of subgroups of patients with schizophrenia to different antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 医学 荟萃分析 系统回顾 人口 精神科 梅德林 抗精神病药 随机对照试验 内科学 政治学 环境卫生 法学
作者
Stefan Leucht,Anna Chaimani,Marc Krause,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Dongfang Wang,Shimeng Dong,Myrto Samara,Natalie Peter,Maximilian Huhn,Josef Priller,John M. Davis
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (11): 884-893 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00304-2
摘要

Background As comparatively few trials in subgroups of patients with schizophrenia have been done, clinicians need to know whether they can rely on the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population of patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the efficacy and side-effects of antipsychotic drugs in different subgroups. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register (from database inception to April 27, 2020), and PubMed (from April 1, 2020 to June 14, 2021). We excluded studies in patients with stable schizophrenia (ie, relapse prevention studies), studies with a high risk of bias, and studies from mainland China due to quality concerns concerning allocation and masking methods. We included single-blind RCTs or better that assessed one or more of 16 second-generation and 18 first-generation antipsychotics in the general population of patients with schizophrenia or in one or more of the subgroups: children and adolescents (age range as defined in the original studies), patients with a first episode, patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, patients with comorbid substance use, patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, or older patients (age range as defined in the original studies). Two authors independently screened the results of the search, retrieved full-text articles, and checked the inclusion criteria. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters were extracted in duplicate. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms. We compared drug efficacy between subgroups, by sex, schizoaffective disorder versus schizophrenia, and study origin using random-effects, inverse variance meta-analyses and random-effects subgroup tests, and meta-regression. Findings We included 537 RCTs with 76 382 participants, 26 627 (34·9%) women, 49 755 (65·1%) men, mean age 37·3 years (range of means 7·9–80·2; ethnicity data not available). 412 RCTs included patients in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, 42 included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 25 included children and adolescents, 20 included patients with their first episode, 20 included patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, 13 included patients with comorbid substance use, and 11 included older patients. Of 507 random-effects subgroup tests done, 46 (9%) showed a significant difference (p<0·05) between subgroups, but there was no clear indication as to which drug should be used in which subgroup. Interpretation The effects of antipsychotics in various patient subgroups were usually similar to those in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, but comparably few studies contributed to the subgroups, in particular in terms of side-effects. If the evidence for treatment in a given subgroup is small, guideline makers and clinicians should consider using the results in the much better studied group of the general population of patients with schizophrenia. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; FKZ 01KG1508)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
瘦瘦完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
qingniujushi完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
menmian发布了新的文献求助50
1秒前
立仔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
海豹发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Monicadd完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
平常如天发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
健忘的沛蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助焕颜采纳,获得10
4秒前
宁祚完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
赘婿应助sssss采纳,获得60
6秒前
淡然棒球完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
翻翻发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
方囧发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
SciGPT应助聪明白开水采纳,获得10
8秒前
猫小曼发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
紫陌发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
geen发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
youlico发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
23lk发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
善学以致用应助海豹采纳,获得10
11秒前
平常如天完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
田様应助路过你的夏采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
乐乐2333333完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
淡然棒球关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
bkagyin应助youlico采纳,获得10
15秒前
可爱的函函应助猫小曼采纳,获得10
15秒前
完美世界应助23lk采纳,获得10
17秒前
wwmmyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
传奇3应助hh采纳,获得10
18秒前
喵小权完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
arzw完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小笨猪完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
Interpretation of Mass Spectra, Fourth Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3956621
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3502685
关于积分的说明 11109755
捐赠科研通 3233502
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1787408
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 870676
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802143