The response of subgroups of patients with schizophrenia to different antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 医学 荟萃分析 系统回顾 人口 精神科 梅德林 抗精神病药 随机对照试验 内科学 环境卫生 政治学 法学
作者
Stefan Leucht,Anna Chaimani,Marc Krause,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Dongfang Wang,Shimeng Dong,Myrto Samara,Natalie Peter,Maximilian Huhn,Josef Priller,John M. Davis
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (11): 884-893 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00304-2
摘要

Background As comparatively few trials in subgroups of patients with schizophrenia have been done, clinicians need to know whether they can rely on the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population of patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the efficacy and side-effects of antipsychotic drugs in different subgroups. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register (from database inception to April 27, 2020), and PubMed (from April 1, 2020 to June 14, 2021). We excluded studies in patients with stable schizophrenia (ie, relapse prevention studies), studies with a high risk of bias, and studies from mainland China due to quality concerns concerning allocation and masking methods. We included single-blind RCTs or better that assessed one or more of 16 second-generation and 18 first-generation antipsychotics in the general population of patients with schizophrenia or in one or more of the subgroups: children and adolescents (age range as defined in the original studies), patients with a first episode, patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, patients with comorbid substance use, patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, or older patients (age range as defined in the original studies). Two authors independently screened the results of the search, retrieved full-text articles, and checked the inclusion criteria. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters were extracted in duplicate. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms. We compared drug efficacy between subgroups, by sex, schizoaffective disorder versus schizophrenia, and study origin using random-effects, inverse variance meta-analyses and random-effects subgroup tests, and meta-regression. Findings We included 537 RCTs with 76 382 participants, 26 627 (34·9%) women, 49 755 (65·1%) men, mean age 37·3 years (range of means 7·9–80·2; ethnicity data not available). 412 RCTs included patients in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, 42 included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 25 included children and adolescents, 20 included patients with their first episode, 20 included patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, 13 included patients with comorbid substance use, and 11 included older patients. Of 507 random-effects subgroup tests done, 46 (9%) showed a significant difference (p<0·05) between subgroups, but there was no clear indication as to which drug should be used in which subgroup. Interpretation The effects of antipsychotics in various patient subgroups were usually similar to those in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, but comparably few studies contributed to the subgroups, in particular in terms of side-effects. If the evidence for treatment in a given subgroup is small, guideline makers and clinicians should consider using the results in the much better studied group of the general population of patients with schizophrenia. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; FKZ 01KG1508)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
欢呼的冰蝶完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
SciGPT应助bwq采纳,获得10
2秒前
研猫完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ffffan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
9527发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
JamesPei应助Chem采纳,获得10
5秒前
欣喜的幻灵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
王利完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
kop发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wwwteng呀完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
纯粹完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
LSQ发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
明亮飞双发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小墨应助9527采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
旁枝完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
在水一方应助kanglan采纳,获得30
17秒前
面包康完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
NexusExplorer应助kop采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
欢呼老鼠完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
执着谷梦发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
全鑫发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
Chem发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
飞快的珩完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
jedeecn完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
bwq发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 1000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
《粉体与多孔固体材料的吸附原理、方法及应用》(需要中文翻译版,化学工业出版社,陈建,周力,王奋英等译) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3084398
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2737347
关于积分的说明 7544854
捐赠科研通 2386981
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1265740
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 613167
版权声明 598320