Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

医学 全直肠系膜切除术 结直肠癌 临床终点 外科 肠系膜下动脉 随机对照试验 腹腔镜手术 机械人手术 直肠 普通外科 放化疗 腹腔镜检查 癌症 放射治疗 内科学
作者
Guang Yang,Weitang Yuan,Taiyuan Li,Bo Tang,Baoqing Jia,Yanbing Zhou,Wei Zhang,Ren Zhao,Cheng Zhang,Longwei Cheng,Xiaoqiao Zhang,Fei Liang,Guodong He,Ye Wei,Jianmin Xu
出处
期刊:The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology [Elsevier]
卷期号:7 (11): 991-1004 被引量:277
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00248-5
摘要

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer is gaining popularity, but evidence on long-term oncological outcomes is scarce. We aimed to compare surgical quality and long-term oncological outcomes of robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Here we report the short-term outcomes of this trial.This multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial was done at 11 hospitals in eight provinces of China. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with middle (>5 to 10 cm from the anal verge) or low (≤5 cm from the anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma, cT1-T3 N0-N1 or ycT1-T3 Nx, and no evidence of distant metastasis. Central randomisation was done by use of an online system and was stratified according to participating centre, sex, BMI, tumour location, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive robotic or conventional laparoscopic surgery. All surgical procedures complied with the principles of total mesorectal excision or partial mesorectal excision (for tumours located higher in the rectum). Lymph nodes at the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery were dissected. In the robotic group, the excision procedures and dissection of lymph nodes were done by use of robotic techniques. Neither investigators nor patients were masked to the treatment allocation but the assessment of pathological outcomes was masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was 3-year locoregional recurrence rate, but the data for this endpoint are not yet mature. Secondary short-term endpoints are reported in this article, including two key secondary endpoints: circumferential resection margin positivity and 30-day postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher). The outcomes were analysed according in a modified intention-to-treat population (according to the original assigned groups and excluding patients who did not undergo surgery or no longer met inclusion criteria after randomisation). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02817126. Study recruitment has completed, and the follow-up is ongoing.Between July 17, 2016, and Dec 21, 2020, 1742 patients were assessed for eligibility. 502 patients were excluded, and 1240 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either robotic surgery (620 patients) or laparoscopic surgery (620 patients). 69 patients were excluded (34 in the robotic surgery group and 35 in the laparoscopic surgery group). 1171 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (586 in the robotic group and 585 in the laparoscopic group). Six patients in the robotic surgery group received laparoscopic surgery and seven patients in the laparoscopic surgery group received robotic surgery. 22 (4·0%) of 547 patients in the robotic group had a positive circumferential resection margin as did 39 (7·2%) of 543 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference -3·2 percentage points [95% CI -6·0 to -0·4]; p=0·023). 95 (16·2%) of patients in the robotic group had at least one postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher) within 30 days after surgery, as did 135 (23·1%) of 585 patients in the laparoscopic group (difference -6·9 percentage points [-11·4 to -2·3]; p=0·003). More patients in the robotic group had a macroscopic complete resection than in the laparoscopic group (559 [95·4%] of 586 patients vs 537 [91·8%] of 585 patients, difference 3·6 percentage points [0·8 to 6·5]). Patients in the robotic group had better postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, shorter postoperative hospital stay (median 7·0 days [IQR 7·0 to 11·0] vs 8·0 days [7·0 to 12·0], difference -1·0 [95% CI -1·0 to 0·0]; p=0·0001), fewer abdominoperineal resections (99 [16·9%] of 586 patients vs 133 [22·7%] of 585 patients, difference -5·8 percentage points [-10·4 to -1·3]), fewer conversions to open surgery (10 [1·7%] of 586 patients vs 23 [3·9%] of 585 patients, difference -2·2 percentage points [-4·3 to -0·4]; p=0·021), less estimated blood loss (median 40·0 mL [IQR 30·0 to 100·0] vs 50·0 mL [40·0 to 100·0], difference -10·0 [-20·0 to -10·0]; p<0·0001), and fewer intraoperative complications (32 [5·5%] of 586 patients vs 51 [8·7%] of 585 patients; difference -3·3 percentage points [-6·3 to -0·3]; p=0·030) than patients in the laparoscopic group.Secondary short-term outcomes suggest that for middle and low rectal cancer, robotic surgery resulted in better oncological quality of resection than conventional laparoscopic surgery, with less surgical trauma, and better postoperative recovery.Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Shanghai, China), and Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (Shanghai, China).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
g7001完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
blue发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
刘铭晨完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
XYZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
wmszhd完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
付艳完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
CAOHOU应助论文顺利采纳,获得10
4秒前
nancy93228完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
搜集达人应助JW采纳,获得10
7秒前
???完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
优秀的白曼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
王小西发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
碧蓝莫言完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
清璃完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
虚心的寒梦完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
秋秋发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
kkk完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
bnhh完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Betty应助lindahuang采纳,获得10
18秒前
ilk666完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小王同学发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
奶油布丁完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
酶没美镁完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
天天快乐应助李治海采纳,获得10
23秒前
星辰大海应助lll采纳,获得10
23秒前
龙1完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
yzhilson完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
RRR完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
金色天际线完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
明ming到此一游完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
pophoo完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
酷炫的黄豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
hzz完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
fang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
Passskd发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
fang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
36秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038303
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576013
关于积分的说明 11374210
捐赠科研通 3305780
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892672
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815029