良好制造规范
监管科学
灵活性(工程)
风险分析(工程)
质量(理念)
业务
患者安全
生物技术
医疗保健
计算机科学
医学
监管事务
生物
认识论
统计
哲学
病理
数学
经济
经济增长
作者
Camellia Zamiri,Danielle L. Leiske,Patricia F. Hughes,J. Paul Kirwan,Evelyn Der,Emily J. Cox,Rob E. Warburton,Monica Goss,Sarah Weiser,Janet Perez-Brown,Ganapathy Gopalrathnam,Jing Liu,Shyam B. Mehta,Shebeer Shereefa,Sebastian von Specht,Sandra Aedo,Pierre Goldbach,Feng Jia,Barbara Kuehnle,Scott F. Page,Liesbeth Voeten,Yi Li,Chen Zhu
出处
期刊:Pda Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
[Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.]
日期:2023-10-17
卷期号:: pdajpst.2022.012806-pdajpst.2022.012806
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012806
摘要
Microbial challenge in–use studies are performed to evaluate the potential for microbial proliferation in preservative–free single dose biological products after first puncture and potential accidental contamination during dose preparation (e.g. reconstitution, dilution) and storage. These studies, in addition to physicochemical in–use stability assessments, are used as part of product registration to define in–use hold times in Prescribing Information and in the pharmacy manual in the case of clinical products. There are no formal guidance documents describing regulator expectations on how to conduct microbial challenge in–use studies and interpret microbial data to assign in–use storage hold-times. In lieu of guidance, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators have authored publications and presentations describing regulator expectations. Insufficient or unavailable microbial challenge data can result in shortened in–use hold times, thus microbial challenge data enables flexibility for health care providers (HCPs) and patients, while ensuring patient safety. A cross-industry/FDA in–use microbial working group was formed through the Innovation & Quality (IQ) Consortium to gain alignment among industry practice and regulator expectations. The working group assessed regulatory guidance, current industry practice via a blinded survey of IQ Consortium member companies, and scientific rationale to align on recommendations for experimental design, execution of microbial challenge in–use studies, and a decision tree for microbial data interpretation to assign in-use hold times. Besides the study execution and data interpretation, additional considerations are discussed including use of platform data for clinical stage products, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), transport of dose solutions, long infusion times, and the use of USP <797> by HCPs for preparing sterile drugs for administration. The recommendations provided in this manuscript will help streamline biological product development, ensure consistency on assignment of in–use hold times in biological product labels across industry, and provide maximum allowable flexibility to HCPs and patients, while ensuring patient safety.