心理学
判别效度
心理信息
医学诊断
临床心理学
DSM-5
结构效度
收敛有效性
心理测量学
等级间信度
病理学
焦虑
测试有效性
精神科
梅德林
评定量表
发展心理学
医学
内部一致性
法学
病理
政治学
作者
Luke H. Schneider,Elizabeth J. Pawluk,Irena Milosevic,Philippe Shnaider,Karen Rowa,Martin M. Antony,Natalia Musielak,Randi E. McCabe
摘要
This article describes the initial validation of the Diagnostic Assessment Research Tool (DART), a modular semistructured interview to facilitate diagnosis of various disorders among adults corresponding with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). In this study, the construct, convergent, and discriminant validity of DART modules for anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and substance-related and addictive disorders was assessed among a sample of 610 participants in a clinical outpatient setting. The data indicated excellent construct validity among DART modules assessed. Individuals with and without DSM-5 diagnoses identified via the DART had significant between-group differences on self-report measures corresponding to these diagnoses. Follow-up logistic regressions supported convergent validity for all diagnostic categories assessed. Discriminant validity was established for the majority of diagnostic categories assessed. High rates of interrater agreement in a small subsample (n = 15) were observed for the various diagnostic categories of the DART (88% average agreement). The results of the present study provide initial support for the DART as a useful tool to aid in the assessment of several major diagnostic categories corresponding with DSM-5 disorders. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI