Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
蓝绝发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
ElioHuang完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
可以叫我凌某某完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
哈哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
丘比特的应助被欣观采纳,获得10
刚刚
打工人发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
彬彬完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
wyw完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Loserta发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
夏天完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被浏阳河采纳,获得10
2秒前
Leslielaw完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
腾腾完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Sagittarius完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zhang1217关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
猫之乐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Hello的应助被来份披萨采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
hbydyy发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
火花完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
桃心心心发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
大个的应助被石会发采纳,获得10
4秒前
耿官豪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被小C采纳,获得10
5秒前
Frank完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
黄上完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
勤恳碧蓉完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
prrrratt完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
不辣酱鱼发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
拼搏的春子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
龙龙ff11_发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Yasong完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
极限001的应助被小精灵鬼采纳,获得80
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
Les Mots du discours 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8123898
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9527649
关于积分的说明 21567619
捐赠科研通 7703352
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3416024
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2541883
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2456706