Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
showtime完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
xyz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Akim应助Anderson采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
善良冰颜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
搜集达人应助Azed采纳,获得10
10秒前
是丹丹呀发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
maplentp完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
搜集达人应助猕猴桃采纳,获得10
14秒前
安利完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
鲤鱼念珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
小瑶发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
David_C完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Ava应助罗布林卡采纳,获得10
24秒前
堇妗完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
Akim应助淡定采纳,获得20
25秒前
阳光飞槐完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
故里完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
某不科学的萌萌应助kk采纳,获得10
27秒前
大意的凝蝶完成签到 ,获得积分20
27秒前
大成子完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
Ok完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
酷波er应助是丹丹呀采纳,获得10
28秒前
呼呼大睡完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
花卷发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
顾矜应助苹果大福采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
adasd完成签到,获得积分20
33秒前
初景应助当时年少采纳,获得20
34秒前
猕猴桃发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
怕黑的半烟完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
Inyz完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
Emily发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
芝士就是力量完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
MHR发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
今后应助binglangcha采纳,获得10
40秒前
ken131完成签到 ,获得积分0
40秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Association of Reentry Well-Being with Psychological Distress, Employment, and Housing Instability 15-Months After Incarceration 500
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7028054
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8698333
关于积分的说明 18430249
捐赠科研通 6527745
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3111611
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2188898
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2087186