Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
幸福遥关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
RivedroiteLynn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
毛容易发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
GH完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
外向棒棒糖完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
焦炸丸子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
完美念薇发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
HPP123发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
斯文败类应助盛乾亮采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
Ikejima完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
YuQi完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
共享精神应助蓝天采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
力元11完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
11秒前
斯文败类应助LL采纳,获得10
13秒前
慕青应助RivedroiteLynn采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
ZYB143发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
滚柱丝杠完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
XieQinxie完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
wxywxywxy完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
wangdake完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
molihuakai应助七言采纳,获得10
16秒前
慕青应助聪明的可愁采纳,获得30
17秒前
高兴花瓣完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
木念发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
xyx完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
WN发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小蘑菇应助千倾采纳,获得10
24秒前
guo发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
沉默的小兔子完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Electrode Potentials 550
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6981966
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8660580
关于积分的说明 18362900
捐赠科研通 6446138
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3093648
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2150822
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2069963