Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
大白发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
沐沐完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
敏感的幻波完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
学术魔域完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助踏实的荟采纳,获得10
5秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
cccc发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科目三应助ylva采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
乌龟娟发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
可靠冥幽发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
热情剑完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zhang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
DW应助123csdkvikd采纳,获得10
6秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
合适易云完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
阿元发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
香蕉觅云应助乔清采纳,获得10
8秒前
akete完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
王大伟2023发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7741413
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9290023
关于积分的说明 20198572
捐赠科研通 7319745
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3306727
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2458937
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2317134