Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
何同学应助liu采纳,获得10
刚刚
李健的小迷弟应助gilderf采纳,获得10
2秒前
合适的虔纹完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
温柔野玫瑰给温柔野玫瑰的求助进行了留言
3秒前
mika完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
roseboy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
bk发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
寒雪之羽完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
csyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
Cain0807发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
wsafhgfjb发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Accpted河豚完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
JUZI发布了新的文献求助40
7秒前
nancyshine完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
有有发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
帅气的惜天完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
闰土完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
柠檬酸钠发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
隐形曼青应助vuu采纳,获得30
10秒前
长情梦竹发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
wsafhgfjb完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Ava应助贪玩心情采纳,获得10
11秒前
SHERRY完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
123hhc发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Lily完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
NexusExplorer应助玄轩小悟风采纳,获得10
13秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
共享精神应助谢大喵采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
NOTHING完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Advanced Memory Technology 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6861719
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8565122
关于积分的说明 18213419
捐赠科研通 6228330
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3047806
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2048184
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2025412