Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
xzn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
贾狗蛋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
tys发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
xiangling1116发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
欣喜豌豆发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
syt完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
mzr发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
夹子方糖完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
阿萨十大发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xiangling1116完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.3应助佳佳采纳,获得10
13秒前
张土豆发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
领导范儿应助眠羊采纳,获得10
14秒前
genhex完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
橘猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
NexusExplorer应助黄辉冯采纳,获得10
16秒前
苹果蜗牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
难过的豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Jasper应助管康淇采纳,获得10
17秒前
kinsley发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
89岁卧床看文完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
六七完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
蓝莓橘子酱给飞鼠的求助进行了留言
20秒前
20秒前
阳阳要努力完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
南风发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Decentring Leadership 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
Intentional optical interference with precision weapons (in Russian) Преднамеренные оптические помехи высокоточному оружию 1000
Atlas of Anatomy 5th original digital 2025的PDF高清电子版(非压缩版,大小约400-600兆,能更大就更好了) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6184586
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8011931
关于积分的说明 16664727
捐赠科研通 5283763
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2816631
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1796421
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1660988