Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
桐桐应助scvrl采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
可靠板栗完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Orange应助羊羊羊采纳,获得10
3秒前
leo完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
zcm1999完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
ningwu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
敏感的又夏完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
打打应助安宇采纳,获得10
6秒前
小七发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
acutelily发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
香酥鱼完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
金皓玄完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
sky发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Ayann发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
冰镇杨梅罐头完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
圈圈圈关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
波谷完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
缓慢醉卉完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
eternity136完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
The Pedagogical Leadership in the Early Years (PLEY) Quality Rating Scale 410
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
Lightning Wires: The Telegraph and China's Technological Modernization, 1860-1890 250
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4602661
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4011768
关于积分的说明 12420364
捐赠科研通 3692108
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2035470
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1068575
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 953144