Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ch185完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
默默帆布鞋完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
CNS完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
XING发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Zzz发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
科研通AI6.1应助ZC采纳,获得10
2秒前
小幼芷完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
陈陈完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
cxy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
orangetwo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
优秀问丝完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
852应助lvv采纳,获得10
3秒前
猫猫虫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
xianhong完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
WZL完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
箱子发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
十二完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
tuao234完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Krositon完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
JamesPei应助宋晨旭采纳,获得10
5秒前
小二郎应助Dx采纳,获得10
6秒前
乐乐应助zhangxun采纳,获得10
6秒前
香蕉觅云应助better采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
宓天问完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Ava应助英勇沧海采纳,获得10
7秒前
Thea完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
小猴儿发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
不会发芽的土豆泥完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
冇_完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
凡事发生必有利于我完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
虚心尔曼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
brown完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6474775
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8277532
关于积分的说明 17651055
捐赠科研通 5555615
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2910108
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1886893
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1739538