Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
不怕困难发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
优秀健柏发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Elowen发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
homer完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
2秒前
虚幻凡柔发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
utln完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
滴滴迪迪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
szl发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
丘比特应助ff采纳,获得10
4秒前
Lala发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
深情安青应助weiyi采纳,获得10
5秒前
maoamo2024发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
fanfan完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
郭娅楠发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lzd发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
daxiuge应助Ahui采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
天真宛筠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
泊凉少年完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
sxh发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
可爱的函函应助1234采纳,获得10
8秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
lzd发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
orixero应助dll采纳,获得10
9秒前
LG关闭了LG文献求助
9秒前
10秒前
lzd发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
谷捣猫宁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 1500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Unlocking Chemical Thinking: Reimagining Chemistry Teaching and Learning 555
CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 36th edition 400
How to Design and Conduct an Experiment and Write a Lab Report: Your Complete Guide to the Scientific Method (Step-by-Step Study Skills) 333
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6363774
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8177716
关于积分的说明 17234880
捐赠科研通 5418841
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2867276
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1844435
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1691887