Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Amantadine for Irritability and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury

金刚烷胺 易怒 安慰剂 不利影响 医学 随机对照试验 心理学 需要伤害的数量 心理干预 精神科 需要治疗的数量 内科学 药理学 替代医学 病理 焦虑
作者
Flora M. Hammond,Ross Zafonte,Mark Sherer,Kathleen Bell,Jennifer Bogner,James F. Malec,Qing Tang,Jeong Hoon Jang
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:102 (10): e5-e5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.402
摘要

Research Objectives To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Design Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Setting Outpatient. Participants 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Interventions Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Main Outcome Measures Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Results Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Conclusions Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression. Author(s) Disclosures Dr. Hammond serves on the Avanir Scientific Advisory Committee. To explore the benefits versus harms of amantadine in the treatment of irritability and aggression. Parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine versus placebo. Outpatient. 168 individuals with chronic TBI and irritability (amantadine n=82 versus placebo n=86). Amantadine 100 mg or placebo equivalent two times daily. Number-Needed-To-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). NNT was calculated using number of individuals with improvement as indicated by Clinical Global Impressions – Global Improvement scale. NNH was calculated using 3 definitions of adverse outcome: number of participants with GI indicating worsening, number of participants with serious adverse events, and number of participants with adverse events. Based on clinician ratings, for every 6 patients treated with amantadine, 1 patient more than placebo would be expected to improve. More participants in the placebo group worsened than in the amantadine group. For every 27 patients treated, 1 more than the placebo would be expected to experience serious adverse events. More participants in the placebo group experienced adverse events of any severity than in the amantadine group. Clinician ratings suggest moderate benefit with low risk to appropriately selected patients. Thus, amantadine should be considered a treatment option for the experienced brain injury clinician. These data may support treatment decisions when a pharmaceutical agent is being considered to control irritability/aggression.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
aajhajkahna的应助被贪玩的送终采纳,获得10
刚刚
ysq完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
内向南风发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
CodeCraft的应助被master采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
天天快乐的应助被默默翠曼采纳,获得10
6秒前
ysq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
牛的捏完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
SciGPT的应助被沉默的念柏采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
甜甜的桐发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
斯文败类的应助被lhtyzcg采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被陈世康采纳,获得10
11秒前
14秒前
wu发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Berner完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
随风发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
19秒前
19秒前
勤恳的语蝶完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
zhr完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
xu发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
kaikai晴发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
旷野完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
你永远是大明星完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
咖啡泡茶发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
oy完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
子时过完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
脑洞疼的应助被科研狂徒采纳,获得10
27秒前
lhtyzcg完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
CODESSA 2000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
Organizational Behavior 510
The Welfare Assembly Line: Public Servants in the Suffering City 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7851354
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9371032
关于积分的说明 20675620
捐赠科研通 7448767
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3344005
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2486680
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2366899