Previous Experience in Medical Decision Making and Advance Care Planning Conversations: Findings From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

预先护理计划 逻辑回归 横断面研究 可能性 临终关怀 医学 调解 样品(材料) 缓和医疗 家庭医学 医疗决策 心理学 护理部 化学 病理 色谱法 政治学 内科学 法学
作者
Peiyuan Zhang,John G. Cagle
出处
期刊:American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:41 (3): 281-287 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1177/10499091231174621
摘要

Background: Despite the extensive literature on facilitating advance care planning (ACP) with patients with serious illnesses, opportunities to include surrogates or family caregivers are overlooked. The research objective was to examine whether previous medical decision-making involvement for a loved one is associated with one’s own ACP conversations with family and the potential mediating effect of knowledge of a loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design using data from the 2016 Kaiser Family Foundation/The Economist Four-Country Survey on Aging and End-of-Life Medical Care. The sample included 627 US adults who completed the survey and were involved in making medical decisions for a loved one in the past. Multiple binary logistic regression and linear regression models were established for mediation analyses. Results: Participants in our nationally derived sample were largely confident in their knowledge of a deceased loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. 66.8% of the sample had ACP conversations with family. The involvement in a loved one’s medical decision making was significantly associated with higher odds of having ACP conversations with family (OR = 1.93, P = .01), but this relationship was significantly mediated by knowledge of one’s end-of-life treatment preferences ( b = .31, Boot CI = .12-.49). Conclusions: Previous experience in making medical decisions for a loved one may facilitate one’s own ACP behavior through knowing a loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. Clinicians in end-of-life settings are uniquely positioned to engage family members who were involved in medical decision-making for others before in ACP.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
shanshan3000发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
嘉心糖应助feng1235采纳,获得100
1秒前
xena发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
Owen应助淡淡翠安采纳,获得10
2秒前
sjr123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
魔真人发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
uuu完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
迅速的宛海完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
939901842完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
丘比特应助零食姐采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
medai发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
翻斗花园葫芦娃完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
fantianhui完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
Narcissus153发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Dr_nie发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
cc完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
jie发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
23秒前
初夏发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
思源应助Keria采纳,获得10
24秒前
酷波er应助Dr_nie采纳,获得10
25秒前
minnom完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
小怪兽发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
26秒前
朴实问儿发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
26秒前
meng完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
30秒前
乐空思应助NEW采纳,获得20
30秒前
30秒前
小松奈奈完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 5000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 第六版习题答案 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6329190
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8145590
关于积分的说明 17086006
捐赠科研通 5383752
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2855264
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1832855
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1684125