Previous Experience in Medical Decision Making and Advance Care Planning Conversations: Findings From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey

预先护理计划 逻辑回归 横断面研究 可能性 临终关怀 医学 调解 样品(材料) 缓和医疗 家庭医学 医疗决策 心理学 护理部 化学 病理 色谱法 政治学 内科学 法学
作者
Peiyuan Zhang,John G. Cagle
出处
期刊:American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:41 (3): 281-287 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1177/10499091231174621
摘要

Background: Despite the extensive literature on facilitating advance care planning (ACP) with patients with serious illnesses, opportunities to include surrogates or family caregivers are overlooked. The research objective was to examine whether previous medical decision-making involvement for a loved one is associated with one’s own ACP conversations with family and the potential mediating effect of knowledge of a loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional design using data from the 2016 Kaiser Family Foundation/The Economist Four-Country Survey on Aging and End-of-Life Medical Care. The sample included 627 US adults who completed the survey and were involved in making medical decisions for a loved one in the past. Multiple binary logistic regression and linear regression models were established for mediation analyses. Results: Participants in our nationally derived sample were largely confident in their knowledge of a deceased loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. 66.8% of the sample had ACP conversations with family. The involvement in a loved one’s medical decision making was significantly associated with higher odds of having ACP conversations with family (OR = 1.93, P = .01), but this relationship was significantly mediated by knowledge of one’s end-of-life treatment preferences ( b = .31, Boot CI = .12-.49). Conclusions: Previous experience in making medical decisions for a loved one may facilitate one’s own ACP behavior through knowing a loved one’s end-of-life treatment preferences. Clinicians in end-of-life settings are uniquely positioned to engage family members who were involved in medical decision-making for others before in ACP.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
华仔应助在不在不在采纳,获得10
1秒前
会盟完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
冰糖葫芦应助qpzn采纳,获得10
2秒前
huhdcid发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小二郎应助Min采纳,获得10
3秒前
天人旧馆发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
冷静芷雪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
研友_LJaro8完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
淡淡怀寒发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
周玲玲完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Min完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
李爱国应助kuyi采纳,获得10
8秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助童广阁采纳,获得10
8秒前
我是老大应助77采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助212采纳,获得10
9秒前
Eurus发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
瑾瑾完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
廿一雨完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
吃饱就睡发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
伍呜呜发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
nayuta完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
匡林威完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
行家AAA发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
heheheli发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
杨夕应助坚强的玉米采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
斯文败类应助蒋美桥采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6528008
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8321087
关于积分的说明 17812932
捐赠科研通 5629615
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2930546
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1907257
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1766657