Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
李泡泡完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
Lxx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ljf完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
李爱国应助合适凡采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
热情的寄瑶完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
乐乐应助猫的淡淡采纳,获得20
5秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
搜集达人应助坦率白竹采纳,获得10
5秒前
1中蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
氯雷他定完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
jankac发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
wjh发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
湿地小怪兽完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
狂野萤完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
JamesPei应助wqx采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
一期一会完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
好的哥发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
df完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
搜集达人应助苏qj采纳,获得10
13秒前
wjh完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
arabidopsis应助阿肖呀采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
tantan发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
鹿笙发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
lzs539完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
AiQi完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
怡然的扬发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
传奇3应助ray采纳,获得10
20秒前
酷波er应助啊啊啊啊轩采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
Brittle fracture in welded ships 1000
Metagames: Games about Games 700
King Tyrant 640
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5572857
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4658866
关于积分的说明 14723060
捐赠科研通 4598750
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2523940
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1494624
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1464638