Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
悦耳的妙竹完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
jackycas完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
雯雯完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
蒲黄妗子完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助能干的台灯采纳,获得10
3秒前
庄海棠完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
bobo完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
jackycas发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
曾经紊完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
大力青槐发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
糊涂涂发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
liu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
强健的蚂蚁完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
Xl完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
秋澄完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
汉堡包应助大海采纳,获得30
10秒前
sunyanghu369发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小蘑菇应助懒祝xifeng采纳,获得10
10秒前
奇异完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
李雨珍完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小王完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Pursuit完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
wfy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
huahua完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
zizhuo2完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
大力水手完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
jiyuan完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
fuyg发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
大力青槐完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
研友_ZGR70n完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
DrQin完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
浅唱完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
dawnstar完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
幼安k完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Coking simulation aids on-stream time 450
北师大毕业论文 基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 390
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 360
Novel Preparation of Chitin Nanocrystals by H2SO4 and H3PO4 Hydrolysis Followed by High-Pressure Water Jet Treatments 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4015859
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3555835
关于积分的说明 11318981
捐赠科研通 3288954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1812355
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 887882
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 812027