清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
温馨家园完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
uo发布了新的文献求助20
20秒前
50秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
55秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
56秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
56秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
56秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
56秒前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
56秒前
uracil97完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
幸运小猫发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
优美香露发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
方白秋完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
温柔冰岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
多啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
奥斯卡完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
笑声像鸭子叫完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
奋斗的小研完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
fighting发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
雨城完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
fighting发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
fighting完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Able完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
幸运小猫完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
laohei94_6完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5706503
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5174433
关于积分的说明 15246998
捐赠科研通 4859993
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2608303
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1559220
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1517002