Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
为你等候完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
feiqi完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
若枫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
坚强的广山完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
老北京发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
淡淡的小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
啊啊啊完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
背后的白山完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
guoxihan完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Vegeta完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
了0完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
道道sy完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
笨笨青筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
大气傲易完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
小燕完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
泽锦臻完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
wfy完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
小小想想完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
子非鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
36秒前
36秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
37秒前
独孤完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
40秒前
老北京发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
奔铂儿钯完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
远山完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
52秒前
yuanletong完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3661140
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222254
关于积分的说明 9744230
捐赠科研通 2931889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605281
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757805
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734569