Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赘婿应助我我我采纳,获得10
1秒前
乔垣结衣发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Singularity应助跳跃尔琴采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
点点点完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
完美世界应助muyassar采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
王路飞发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
hrrypeet发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
程勋航发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
李健的小迷弟应助狒狒采纳,获得10
6秒前
jessie完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
安信怀发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
pp.gsyx完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
大个应助嘀嘀嘀采纳,获得10
9秒前
天天向上发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
孙传铭发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
隐形曼青应助niuma采纳,获得10
10秒前
123456完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
情怀应助发生了什么树采纳,获得10
11秒前
丘比特应助完美的雪旋采纳,获得10
11秒前
re6irth完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大大彬发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
清爽的如天完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
wanci应助baobeikk采纳,获得10
12秒前
dx发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI5应助跳跃尔琴采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
XT666发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
17秒前
丘比特应助una采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
狒狒发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
Applied Survey Data Analysis (第三版, 2025) 800
Assessing and Diagnosing Young Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2nd Edition) 700
Images that translate 500
引进保护装置的分析评价八七年国外进口线路等保护运行情况介绍 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3842025
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3384185
关于积分的说明 10533034
捐赠科研通 3104519
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1709644
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 823319
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 773953