蒸发冷却器
聚光镜(光学)
空调
蒸汽压缩制冷
环境科学
相对湿度
气流
混合动力系统
制冷剂
冷却能力
湿度
干燥剂
气象学
汽车工程
核工程
工程类
工艺工程
气体压缩机
机械工程
计算机科学
物理
光学
机器学习
光源
作者
Yang Yang,Chong Ren,De Xie,Min Tu,Guojie Chen,Qian Luo
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122084
摘要
Existing evaporative-cooling hybrid air conditioning systems cannot fully utilize the synergistic energy-saving potential of multiple evaporative-cooling technologies. Moreover, they cannot meet simultaneously the energy-saving requirements of standard mechanical vapor compression (MVC) systems in the terms of fresh air pre-treatment, condenser pre-cooling and supply air reheating. Therefore, in this paper, integrating MVC system with the indirect evaporative cooler, outdoor-air evaporative-cooling unit, and run-around reheating coils, three alternative hybrid systems were proposed to meet the aforementioned three requirements. The three hybrid systems have different outdoor-air unit configurations (single condenser with direct evaporative cooler, dual condenser with direct evaporative cooler, and dual condenser with two-stage evaporative-cooling configuration) and reheat sources (exhaust, outdoor, and mixed air of fresh and return air). Then, the parameter effects and application potentials of the three hybrid systems were analyzed comparatively based on detailed numerical models. The results showed that the third proposed hybrid system (HAC-R3) exhibits the best energy-saving advantages in almost the range of ambient temperature, relative humidity and fresh airflow rate studied. The first proposed hybrid system (HAC-R1) has the simplest outdoor-air side configuration, which is also a good choice in medium-low humidity conditions. In hot-humid summer in southern China, HAC-R3 has the highest average energy-saving rate and seasonal COP of 16.0% and 7.0 respectively. In addition, HAC-R1 has the lowest static equipment payback period of 3.3 years, slightly lower than that of HAC-R3 (3.4 years).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI