风险管理
项目风险管理
风险管理计划
IT风险管理
知识管理
企业风险管理
项目管理
OPM3
独创性
项目管理三角形
过程管理
业务
定性研究
计算机科学
社会学
管理
经济
财务
社会科学
作者
Pelle Lundquist Willumsen,Josef Oehmen,Hani Mike Rae Selim
出处
期刊:International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
[Emerald (MCB UP)]
日期:2024-07-31
卷期号:17 (4/5): 593-617
标识
DOI:10.1108/ijmpb-09-2023-0214
摘要
Purpose This paper explores how risks are managed in project practice beyond formalized risk management processes by applying the lens of actuality research to project risk management. Design/methodology/approach The paper follows a qualitative multimethod research approach utilizing literature review, interviews, observations and document analysis. The paper is based on three case studies and one interview study in project organizations facing green transition challenges. Findings Little work exists to reveal how risk management is actually done by project practitioners, and why. Few studies report on contextual variation and consider confounding factors beyond a “one size fits all” formalized explicit risk management process, despite ample evidence that risks are managed outside the formal process. The study documents that informal and/or implicit risk management activities add significantly more value. Originality/value The paper contributes a literature review of research into the actuality of project risk management, a sense-making framework of how risks are managed in practice beyond the formal, explicit risk-management process by including informal and/or implicit risk management activities, an empirical study of risk-management practice highlighting that informal and/or implicit risk-management activities dominate in practice, a discussion of why risks are managed outside formalized, explicit process and a research agenda to enable the design of impactful project risk-management practices.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI