作者
Xiaoying Zou,Xin Zheng,Yu-Hong Liang,Chengfei Zhang,Bing Fan,Jingping Liang,Junqi Ling,Zhuan Bian,Qing Yu,Benxiang Hou,Zhi Chen,Xi Wei,Lihong Qiu,Wenxia Chen,Wenxi He,Xin Xu,Liuyan Meng,Chen Zhang,Liming Chen,Shuli Deng,Yayan Lei,Xiaoli Xie,Yan Wang,Jinhua Yu,Jin Zhao,Shen Song,Xuedong Zhou,Lin Yue
摘要
Abstract Chemical cleaning and disinfection are crucial steps for eliminating infection in root canal treatment. However, irrigant selection or irrigation procedures are far from clear. The vapor lock effect in the apical region has yet to be solved, impeding irrigation efficacy and resulting in residual infections and compromised treatment outcomes. Additionally, ambiguous clinical indications for root canal medication and non-standardized dressing protocols must be clarified. Inappropriate intracanal medication may present side effects and jeopardize the therapeutic outcomes. Indeed, clinicians have been aware of these concerns for years. Based on the current evidence of studies, this article reviews the properties of various irrigants and intracanal medicaments and elucidates their effectiveness and interactions. The evolution of different kinetic irrigation methods, their effects, limitations, the paradigm shift, current indications, and effective operational procedures regarding intracanal medication are also discussed. This expert consensus aims to establish the clinical operation guidelines for root canal irrigation and a position statement on intracanal medication, thus facilitating a better understanding of infection control, standardizing clinical practice, and ultimately improving the success of endodontic therapy.