Ten Year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

医学 颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术 退行性椎间盘病 关节置换术 外科 随机对照试验 回顾性队列研究 不利影响 可视模拟标度 荟萃分析 队列研究 并发症 队列 内科学 颈椎 腰椎
作者
Ernesto S. Quinto,Noah D. Paisner,Eric G. Huish,Moris Senegor
出处
期刊:Spine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:49 (7): 463-469 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000004887
摘要

Study Design. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and comparative retrospective cohort studies. Objective. The purpose of this study is to compare the 10-year outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Summary of Background Data. ACDF is the gold standard for the treatment of CDDD. However, the loss of motion at the operative level may accelerate adjacent segment disease (ASD). The preservation of motion with CDA attempts to prevent this complication of cervical fusion. Short-term and mid-term data reveal comparable results for CDA versus ACDF; however, long-term results are unknown. Materials and Methods. A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to determine if CDA had improved outcomes compared with ACDF at 10-year follow-up. PubMed and Web of Science database searches through 2023 were performed to identify randomized controlled trials and comparative retrospective cohort studies involving treatment of one-level or two-level CDDD. Results. Six studies were eligible for analysis. CDA had significantly improved neck disability index and visual analog scale scores but lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared to ACDF at 10-year follow-up ( P < 0.05). None of these results met minimal clinically important differences. CDA had significantly fewer secondary surgeries and adverse events compared to ACDF ( P <0.05). There were no significant differences in neurological success. Conclusions. The authors found that significantly fewer secondary surgeries and adverse events were seen after CDA than after ACDF at 10-year follow-up. CDA had statistically, but not clinically, improved neck disability index and visual analog scale scores but lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores in comparison to ACDF. CDA was not significantly different from ACDF in terms of a successful neurological outcome.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
NexusExplorer应助HanJinyu采纳,获得30
2秒前
huoguo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小美完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Han发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
sophia发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
xiaoxin完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
禹超发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
柯克发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xiaoxin发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
劉浏琉完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
完美世界应助大黄采纳,获得10
11秒前
Mic应助小叔叔采纳,获得10
13秒前
viettu7d完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
柯克完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
李李李发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
1111一完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
miaomiao完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
徐凤年完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
22秒前
YOLO发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
路宇鹏完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
aca发布了新的文献求助20
25秒前
25秒前
Akim应助鱼鱼子999采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
满意沛槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
菜菜发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
超级幼旋应助徐小赞采纳,获得10
29秒前
科目三应助Davidjin采纳,获得10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
The Victim–Offender Overlap During the Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study Across Western and Non-Western Countries 1000
King Tyrant 720
T/CIET 1631—2025《构网型柔性直流输电技术应用指南》 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5589694
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4674337
关于积分的说明 14793127
捐赠科研通 4628980
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2532400
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1501066
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1468487