运动员
荟萃分析
物理医学与康复
心理干预
前交叉韧带损伤
物理疗法
医学
计算机科学
心理学
前交叉韧带
外科
内科学
精神科
作者
Di Wang,Anu Valtonen,T.P.H. Thiel,Lauri Stenroth,Ying Gao,Juha‐Pekka Kulmala
标识
DOI:10.2519/jospt.2024.12720
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of injury prevention programs (IPPs) for improving high-risk knee motion patterns in the context of reducing the risk of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. DESIGN: Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched until September 10 th , 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving athletes without prior ACL injury. The trials had to provide data on peak knee flexion and valgus angles, obtained from two-leg drop vertical jump, single-leg drop vertical jump, or side-step cutting test. RESULTS: The NMA synthesized data from 22 RCTs involving 878 participants, evaluating 12 different IPPs. Results of meta-analyses indicated that, in jumping tests, the external focus instructions (mean difference (MD)=26, Credible interval (CrI)=7.5 to 44, Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA)=0.94) and internal focus of attention (MD=19, CrI=0.19 to 37, SUCRA=0.81) was effective for increasing peak knee flexion, and core stability training ranked first for reducing knee valgus (MD=−4.40, CrI=−7.7 to -1.1, SUCRA=0.96). None of the IPPs revealed statistically significant effects for the cutting test. CONCLUSION: The external focus instructions and internal focus of attention increased knee flexion, while core stability exercise reduced knee valgus in jumping tests. Intervention effects were inconsistent for cutting tests.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI