亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study

医学 静脉通路 背景(考古学) 随机对照试验 干预(咨询) 定性研究 家庭医学 急诊医学 外科 护理部 导管 社会科学 生物 社会学 古生物学
作者
Caoimhe Ryan,Hannah Hesselgreaves,Olívia Wu,Jonathan Moss,James Paul,Judith Dixon-Hughes,Evi Germeni
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:9 (7): e026077-e026077 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026077
摘要

Objective Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs) are routinely used in the delivery of intravenous systemic anticancer therapy (SACT): peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), subcutaneously tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices) and totally implantable chest wall ports (Ports). This qualitative study, nested within a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, sought to explore patient acceptability and experiences of the three devices. Design Eight focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Setting Six outpatient cancer treatment centres in the UK. Participants Forty-two patients (20 female, mean age 61.7 years) who had taken part or were taking part in the broader trial. Intervention As part of the larger, randomised controlled trial, participants had been randomly assigned one of three CVADs for the administration of SACT. Results Attitudes towards all three devices were positive, with patients viewing their CVAD as part of their treatment and recovery. Participants with PICCs and Hickmans tended to compare their device favourably with peripheral cannulation. By comparison, participants with Ports consistently compared their device with PICCs and Hickmans, emphasising the perceived superiority of Ports. Ports were perceived to offer unique psychological benefits, including a greater sense of freedom and less intrusion in the context of personal relationships. Conclusions Patient experiences and preferences have not been systematically used to inform policy and practice regarding CVAD availability and selection. Our research identified patterns of patient device preferences that favoured Ports, although this was not universal. Results of this study could improve support for patients and offer greater scope for incorporating patient perspectives into decision-making processes. Trial registration number NCT44504648

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6秒前
11秒前
rerekey发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
溪陆发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
冉亦发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
浅忆完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
海棠依旧发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
鸫鸫完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
萧水白应助冉亦采纳,获得10
30秒前
所所应助rerekey采纳,获得10
36秒前
冉亦完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
汉堡包应助酚酞v采纳,获得10
41秒前
41秒前
海棠依旧发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
海棠依旧完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
单纯乘风完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
平淡雪枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
明理从蓉发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1分钟前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
hhf完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
冰西瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
溪陆完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Yam完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
lonely发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
rerekey发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
田様应助认真的新筠采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
liubo发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助lin采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3126059
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2776271
关于积分的说明 7729679
捐赠科研通 2431643
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1292218
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622582
版权声明 600392