Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study

医学 静脉通路 背景(考古学) 随机对照试验 干预(咨询) 定性研究 家庭医学 急诊医学 外科 护理部 导管 社会科学 生物 社会学 古生物学
作者
Caoimhe Ryan,Hannah Hesselgreaves,Olívia Wu,Jonathan Moss,James Paul,Judith Dixon-Hughes,Evi Germeni
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:9 (7): e026077-e026077 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026077
摘要

Objective Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs) are routinely used in the delivery of intravenous systemic anticancer therapy (SACT): peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), subcutaneously tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices) and totally implantable chest wall ports (Ports). This qualitative study, nested within a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, sought to explore patient acceptability and experiences of the three devices. Design Eight focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Setting Six outpatient cancer treatment centres in the UK. Participants Forty-two patients (20 female, mean age 61.7 years) who had taken part or were taking part in the broader trial. Intervention As part of the larger, randomised controlled trial, participants had been randomly assigned one of three CVADs for the administration of SACT. Results Attitudes towards all three devices were positive, with patients viewing their CVAD as part of their treatment and recovery. Participants with PICCs and Hickmans tended to compare their device favourably with peripheral cannulation. By comparison, participants with Ports consistently compared their device with PICCs and Hickmans, emphasising the perceived superiority of Ports. Ports were perceived to offer unique psychological benefits, including a greater sense of freedom and less intrusion in the context of personal relationships. Conclusions Patient experiences and preferences have not been systematically used to inform policy and practice regarding CVAD availability and selection. Our research identified patterns of patient device preferences that favoured Ports, although this was not universal. Results of this study could improve support for patients and offer greater scope for incorporating patient perspectives into decision-making processes. Trial registration number NCT44504648

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小肥完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
果果完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
GuMingyang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
ming发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
3秒前
执着听兰发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
潇湘夜雨发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
杰哥发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
沫沫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
dachengzi发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
8秒前
万能图书馆应助Jzhang采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
ZoeChoo发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
泡泡完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
二九十八发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
kunner发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
66完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
青4096发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
李健应助LIU采纳,获得10
15秒前
cqwllllyh完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
激昂的南烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
搜集达人应助qyang采纳,获得10
18秒前
renshiq完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
eric完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
机械小白完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
SONG完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
青4096完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
生如夏花完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
LIU发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
brightmys完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3670801
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3227675
关于积分的说明 9776795
捐赠科研通 2937868
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1609663
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760441
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735928