亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Use of Digital Rectal Examination as an Adjunct to Prostate Specific Antigen in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

医学 直肠检查 前列腺癌 生物统计学 医疗保健 普通外科 癌症 流行病学 内科学 法学 政治学
作者
Peter N. Schlegel,Clara Oromendia,Jonathan E. Shoag,Sameer Mittal,Michael F. Cosiano,Karla V. Ballman,Andrew J. Vickers,Jim C. Hu
出处
期刊:The Journal of Urology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:199 (4): 947-953 被引量:66
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.021
摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Apr 2018Use of Digital Rectal Examination as an Adjunct to Prostate Specific Antigen in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Joshua A. Halpern, Clara Oromendia, Jonathan E. Shoag, Sameer Mittal, Michael F. Cosiano, Karla V. Ballman, Andrew J. Vickers, and Jim C. Hu Joshua A. HalpernJoshua A. Halpern Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author , Clara OromendiaClara Oromendia Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author , Jonathan E. ShoagJonathan E. Shoag Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author , Sameer MittalSameer Mittal Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author , Michael F. CosianoMichael F. Cosiano Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author , Karla V. BallmanKarla V. Ballman Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author , Andrew J. VickersAndrew J. Vickers Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York More articles by this author , and Jim C. HuJim C. Hu Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical and Genomic Health. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.021AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Guidelines from the NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) advocate digital rectal examination screening only in men with elevated prostate specific antigen. We investigated the effect of prostate specific antigen on the association of digital rectal examination and clinically significant prostate cancer in a large American cohort. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the records of the 35,350 men who underwent digital rectal examination in the screening arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial for the development of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 7 or greater). Followup was 343,273 person-years. The primary outcome was the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer among men with vs without suspicious digital rectal examination. We performed competing risks regression to evaluate the interaction between time varying suspicious digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. Results: A total of 1,713 clinically significant prostate cancers were detected with a 10-year cumulative incidence of 5.9% (95% CI 5.6–6.2). Higher risk was seen for suspicious vs nonsuspicious digital rectal examination. Increases in absolute risk were small and clinically irrelevant for normal (less than 2 ng/ml) prostate specific antigen (1.5% vs 0.7% risk of clinically significant prostate cancer at 10 years), clinically relevant for elevated (3 ng/ml or greater) prostate specific antigen (23.0% vs 13.7%) and modestly clinically relevant for equivocal (2 to 3 ng/ml) prostate specific antigen (6.5% vs 3.5%). Conclusions: Digital rectal examination demonstrated prognostic usefulness when prostate specific antigen was greater than 3 ng/ml, limited usefulness for less than 2 ng/ml and marginal usefulness for 2 to 3 ng/ml. These findings support the restriction of digital rectal examination to men with higher prostate specific antigen as a reflex test to improve specificity. It should not be used as a primary screening modality to improve sensitivity. References 1 : Evidence of prostate cancer “reverse stage migration” toward more advanced disease at diagnosis: data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Urol Oncol2016; 34: 335.e21. Google Scholar 2 : Increasing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis2016; 19: 395. Google Scholar 3 : Early detection of prostate cancer by routine screening. JAMA1984; 252: 3261. Google Scholar 4 : Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol1994; 151: 1283. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Changing role of 3 screening modalities in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (Rotterdam). Int J Cancer1999; 84: 437. Google Scholar 6 : Disease-specific survival following routine prostate cancer screening by digital rectal examination. JAMA1993; 269: 61. Google Scholar 7 : Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators. Eur Urol2012; 61: 577. Google Scholar 8 : The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol2008; 54: 581. Google Scholar 9 : Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol2013; 190: 419. Link, Google Scholar 10 : NCCN Guidelines insights: prostate cancer early detection, version 2.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2016; 14: 509. Google Scholar 11 : Prognostic significance of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Arm. J Urol2017; 197: 363. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials2000; 21: 273S. Google Scholar 13 : Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. J Urol2005; 173: 746. Link, Google Scholar 14 : A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc1999; 94: 496. Google Scholar 15 : Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med2009; 360: 1310. Google Scholar 16 : Reevaluating PSA testing rates in the PLCO trial. N Engl J Med2016; 374: 1795. Google Scholar 17 : An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men. BJU Int2007; 99: 559. Google Scholar 18 : Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst2006; 98: 529. Google Scholar 19 : Is it time to abandon the digital rectal examination? Lessons from the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial and peer-reviewed literature. Curr Med Res Opin2017; 33: 315. Google Scholar 20 : External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population. Urology2006; 68: 1152. Google Scholar 21 : Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost. J Endourol Soc2013; 27: 182. Google Scholar 22 : Quality control of cancer screening examination procedures in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Project Team. Control Clin Trials2000; 21: 390S. Google Scholar © 2018 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTosoian J, Trock B, Morgan T, Salami S, Tomlins S, Spratt D, Siddiqui J, Kunju L, Botbyl R, Chopra Z, Pandian B, Eyrich N, Longton G, Zheng Y, Palapattu G, Wei J, Niknafs Y and Chinnaiyan A (2020) Use of the MyProstateScore Test to Rule Out Clinically Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing ApproachJournal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 3, (732-739), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021.Aminsharifi A, Howard L, Wu Y, De Hoedt A, Bailey C, Freedland S and Polascik T (2018) Prostate Specific Antigen Density as a Predictor of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer When the Prostate Specific Antigen is in the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Defining the Optimum Cutoff Point Stratified by Race and Body Mass IndexJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 4, (758-766), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.Smith J (2018) This Month in Adult UrologyJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 4, (863-864), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018. Volume 199Issue 4April 2018Page: 947-953Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsearly detection of cancerprostate-specific antigendigital rectal examinationprostatic neoplasmsmass screeningAcknowledgmentsNCI (National Cancer Institute) provided access to NCI data collected in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.MetricsAuthor Information Joshua A. Halpern Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author Clara Oromendia Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author Jonathan E. Shoag Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author Sameer Mittal Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author Michael F. Cosiano Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York More articles by this author Karla V. Ballman Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York More articles by this author Andrew J. Vickers Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York More articles by this author Jim C. Hu Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York Financial interest and/or other relationship with Intuitive Surgical and Genomic Health. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
8秒前
archer01发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
21秒前
23秒前
Maria完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
46秒前
TS6539发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
TS6539完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
bababiba完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
CipherSage应助archer01采纳,获得10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
4分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
月儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
冬去春来完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
小江完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
gszy1975完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
5分钟前
Chaos完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
光合作用完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
八个猪宝贝完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
lameliu完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
香蕉觅云应助Viiigo采纳,获得10
6分钟前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3957061
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3503084
关于积分的说明 11111255
捐赠科研通 3234121
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1787751
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 870772
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802264